![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
October 26, 2012 Dr. Fernando C. Gomez Vice Chancellor and General Counsel The Texas State University System 208 East 10th Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701-2407 OR2012-17168 Dear Dr. Gomez: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 472209. Texas State University-San Marcos (the "university") received a request for security camera footage involving the Bexar Hall residential complex and a specified time period. You claim the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the information you submitted. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This exception encompasses information made confidential by other statutes. You claim section 552.101 in conjunction with section 418.182 of the Government Code, which was added to chapter 418 of the Government Code as part of the Texas Homeland Security Act. Section 418.182 provides as follows: (a) Except as provided by Subsections (b) and (c), information, including access codes and passwords, in the possession of a governmental entity that relates to the specifications, operating procedures, or location of a security system used to protect public or private property from an act of terrorism or related criminal activity is confidential. (b) Financial information in the possession of a governmental entity that relates to the expenditure of funds by a governmental entity for a security system is public information that is not excepted from required disclosure under [the Act]. (c) Information in the possession of a governmental entity that relates to the location of a security camera in a private office at a state agency, including an institution of higher education, as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code, is public information and is not excepted from required disclosure under [the Act] unless the security camera: (1) is located in an individual personal residence for which the state provides security; or (2) is in use for surveillance in an active criminal investigation. Id. § 418.182. The fact information may generally be related to a security system does not make the information per se confidential under section 418.182. See Open Records Decision No. 649 at 3 (1996) (language of confidentiality provision controls scope of its protection). Furthermore, the mere recitation by a governmental body of a statute's key terms is not sufficient to demonstrate the applicability of a claimed provision. As with any confidentiality provision, a governmental body that claims section 418.182 must adequately explain how the responsive information falls within the scope of the statute. See Gov't Code § 552.301(e)(1)(A) (governmental body must explain how claimed exception to disclosure applies). You explain the university provides security cameras inside and outside of all student residence halls. You state the cameras are a necessary part of the overall campus security system. You assert release of the submitted security camera footage would reveal security procedures that are in place to protect campus residence halls and students. You have submitted an affidavit executed by the supervisor of access services of the university's police department. His affidavit states release of the submitted video would reveal the field of view, video resolution, low light sensitivity, and recording capabilities of cameras protecting Bexar Hall. He asserts that revealing the characteristics of the cameras would enable a criminal or terrorist to avoid detection while entering or leaving Bexar Hall. He contends release of the video could compromise campus safety. We note neither of the exceptions to confidentiality under section 418.182 appears to be applicable in this instance. See id. § 418.182(b)-(c). Thus, based on your representations, the submitted affidavit, and our review, we agree section 418.182(a) is applicable to the information at issue. We therefore conclude the university must withhold the submitted information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 418.182 of the Government Code. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, James W. Morris, III Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JWM/bhf Ref: ID# 472209 Enc: Submitted information c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |