Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

September 17, 2012

Ms. Michelle M. Kretz

Assistant City Attorney

City of Fort Worth

1000 Throckmorton Street, Third Floor

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

OR2012-14706

Dear Ms. Kretz:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 467751 (City of Fort Worth PIR No. W018813).

The Fort Worth Police Department (the "department") received a request for information pertaining to a named officer. You state the department has released some of the requested information. You state the department has redacted information in accordance with section 552.130(c) of the Government Code and the previous determinations issued to the city in Open Records Letter Nos. 2006-14726 (2006) and 2007-00198 (2007); section 552.147 of the Government Code; and Open Records Decision No. 670 (2001). See Gov't Code §§ 552.130, 552.147(b), 552.301(c); Open Records Decision No. 673 at 7-8 (2001). You claim some of the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.102, and 552.137 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, you inform us portions of the submitted information are not responsive to the request. This decision does not address the public availability of the nonresponsive information and the department is not required to release it in response to the present request.

Next, you inform us some of the requested information was the subject of a previous request for information, in response to which this office issued Open Records Letter No. 2009-13196 (2009). In that ruling, we determined the City of Fort Worth (the "city") must withhold certain information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 6103(a) of title 26 of the United States Code, section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code, section 772.218 of the Health and Safety Code, and common-law privacy, as well as certain information under sections 552.117(a)(2), 552.137, and 552.140 of the Government Code, but must release the remaining information. We have no indication the law, facts, and circumstances on which the prior ruling was based have changed. Accordingly, to the extent the information in the current request is identical to the information previously requested and ruled upon by this office, we conclude the department must continue to rely on Open Records Letter No. 2009-13196 as a previous determination and withhold or release the information in accordance with that ruling. To the extent the submitted information is not subject to Open Records Letter No. 2009-13196, we will address your arguments against disclosure.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." This section excepts from disclosure information deemed confidential by statute, such as section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. You state the city is a civil service city under chapter 143 of the Local Government Code. Section 143.089 contemplates two different types of personnel files: a police officer's civil service file that the civil service director is required to maintain, and an internal file that the police department may maintain for its own use. Local Gov't Code § 143.089(a), (g). In cases in which a police department investigates a police officer's misconduct and takes disciplinary action against an officer, it is required by section 143.089(a)(2) to place all investigatory records relating to the investigation and disciplinary action, including background documents such as complaints, witness statements, and documents of like nature from individuals who were not in a supervisory capacity, in the police officer's civil service file maintained under section 143.089(a). (1) Abbott v. City of Corpus Christi, 109 S.W.3d 113, 122 (Tex. App.--Austin 2003, no pet.). All investigatory materials in a case resulting in disciplinary action are "from the employing department" when they are held by or in possession of the department because of its investigation into a police officer's misconduct, and the department must forward them to the civil service commission for placement in the civil service personnel file. Id. Such records are subject to release under the Act. See Local Gov't Code § 143.089(f); Open Records Decision No. 562 at 6 (1990). However, information maintained in a police department's internal file pursuant to section 143.089(g) is confidential and must not be released. City of San Antonio v. Texas Attorney Gen., 851 S.W.2d 946, 949 (Tex. App.--Austin 1993, writ denied).

You inform us the submitted information you have marked and indicated under section 143.089 pertains to investigations that did not result in disciplinary action against the officer. You state this information is maintained in the police department's internal files concerning the named officer. Based on your representations and our review of the documents at issue, we agree the department must withhold the information you have marked and indicated under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code. (2)

Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the Medical Practice Act (the "MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides in part the following:

(b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained.

Occ. Code § 159.002(b), (c). Medical records must be released upon the patient's signed, written consent, provided the consent specifies (1) the information to be covered by the release, (2) reasons or purposes for the release, and (3) the person to whom the information is to be released. Id. §§ 159.004, 159.005. Section 159.002(c) also requires any subsequent release of medical records be consistent with the purposes for which the governmental body obtained the records. Open Records Decision No. 565 at 7 (1990). Medical records may be released only as provided under the MPA. Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991). Upon review, we find none of the remaining information consists of medical records. Therefore, the department may not withhold any of the remaining information under section 552.101 in conjunction with the MPA.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." This section encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). The types of information considered intimate or embarrassing by the Texas Supreme Court in Industrial Foundation included information relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. Id. at 683. This office has found some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses are excepted from required public disclosure under common-law privacy. E.g. Open Records Decision Nos. 470 (1987) (illness from severe emotional and job-related stress), 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps). Some of the submitted information is highly intimate or embarrassing and is not of legitimate concern to the public. Therefore, the department must withhold this information, which we have marked, under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy.

You also claim some of the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.102 of the Government Code. Section 552.102(a) excepts from disclosure "information in a personnel file, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." Gov't Code § 552.102(a). The Texas Supreme Court recently held section 552.102(a) excepts from disclosure the dates of birth of state employees in the payroll database of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Tex. Comptroller of Pub. Accounts v. Attorney Gen. of Tex., 354 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. 2010). We agree the department must withhold the information you have marked under section 552.102(a) of the Government Code.

To conclude, the department must continue to rely on Open Records Letter No. 2009-13196 as a previous determination and withhold or release the requested information at issue in accordance with that ruling. The department must withhold the information you have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code and the information we have marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. The department must also withhold the information you have marked under section 552.102 of the Government Code. The department must release the remaining information.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

James L. Coggeshall

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

JLC/tch

Ref: ID# 467751

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. Chapter 143 prescribes the following types of disciplinary actions: removal, suspension, demotion, and uncompensated duty. See Local Gov't Code §§ 143.051-143.055.

2. As our ruling is dispositive, we do not address your other arguments to withhold this information. In addition, section 143.089(g) requires a police department that receives a request for information maintained in a file under section 143.089(g) to refer that person to the civil service director or the director's designee.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs