![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
July 24, 2012 Ms. Linda Pemberton Paralegal City of Killeen P.O. Box 1329 Killeen, Texas 76540-1329 OR2012-11476 Dear Ms. Pemberton: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 459831 (ID #W007912). The City of Killeen (the "city") received a request for four categories of information pertaining to a specified address from a specified time period: (1) all calls for police service to the specified address; (2) all calls for police service within a one-mile radius of the specified address; (3) all incident reports related to the specified address; and (4) all incident reports within a one-mile radius of the specified address. (1) You inform us that some of the requested information has been or will be released to the requestor. You claim the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative samples of information. (2) Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). A governmental body must reasonably explain how and why section 552.108 is applicable to the information at issue. See id. § 552.301(e)(1)(A); Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). Section 552.108 may be invoked by the proper custodian of information relating to a pending investigation or prosecution of criminal conduct. See Open Records Decision No. 474 at 4-5 (1987). You inform us that some of the submitted information relates to a criminal investigation that the city's police department (the "department") has yet to complete. You also inform us that the release of this information would hinder the ability of detectives to conduct a thorough investigation. In addition, you represent the Bell County Attorney's Office has informed you that it objects to the release of some of the submitted information because doing so would interfere with pending criminal prosecutions. Based on your representations and our review, we conclude release of the information at issue would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime. See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975) (court delineates law enforcement interests that are present in active cases), writ ref'd per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976). Accordingly, section 552.108(a)(1) is applicable to this information, which we have marked. Section 552.108(a)(2) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . it is information that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime only in relation to an investigation that did not result in conviction or deferred adjudication[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(2). This section is applicable only if the information at issue relates to a concluded criminal case that did not result in a conviction or deferred adjudication. As noted above, a governmental body that claims an exception to disclosure under section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why this exception is applicable to the information the governmental body seeks to withhold. See id. § 552.301(e)(1)(A); Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706. You inform us that some of the submitted information relates to a concluded criminal investigation that was conducted by the department. You state the department does not anticipate filing any charges in this case in the future. Based on your representations and our review, we conclude section 552.108(a)(2) is applicable to the information at issue, which we have marked. However, section 552.108 does not except from disclosure "basic information about an arrested person, an arrest, or a crime." Gov't Code § 552.108(c). Section 552.108(c) refers to the basic front-page offense and arrest information held to be public in Houston Chronicle. See 531 S.W.2d at 186-88; Open Records Decision No. 127 at 3-4 (1976) (summarizing types of information deemed public by Houston Chronicle). Thus, with the exception of basic information, which you state has been released, the city may withhold the information we have marked under sections 552.108(a)(1) and 552.108(a)(2) of the Government Code. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information protected by other statutes, such as section 58.007 of the Family Code, which provides in relevant part: (c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), law enforcement records and files concerning a child and information stored, by electronic means or otherwise, concerning the child from which a record or file could be generated may not be disclosed to the public and shall be: (1) if maintained on paper or microfilm, kept separate from adult files and records; (2) if maintained electronically in the same computer system as records or files relating to adults, be accessible under controls that are separate and distinct from controls to access electronic data concerning adults; and (3) maintained on a local basis only and not sent to a central state or federal depository, except as provided by Subchapters B, D, and E. Fam. Code § 58.007(c). Section 58.007(c) is applicable to records of juvenile delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision that occurred on or after September 1, 1997. See id. § 51.03(a)-(b) (defining "delinquent conduct" and "conduct indicating a need for supervision" for purposes of section 58.007). For purposes of section 58.007, "child" means a person who is ten years of age or older and under seventeen years of age at the time of the reported conduct. See id. § 51.02(2). You claim some of the remaining information is protected by section 58.007(c). Upon review, we agree the information at issue involves juvenile conduct indicating a need for supervision that occurred after September 1, 1997. You do not indicate, nor does it appear, that any of the exceptions in section 58.007 apply to this information. Accordingly, we conclude the information we have marked is confidential pursuant to section 58.007(c) of the Family Code, and the city must withhold it under section 552.101 of the Government Code. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses section 261.201(a) of the Family Code. Section 261.201(a) provides: (a) [T]he following information is confidential, is not subject to public release under [the Act] and may be disclosed only for purposes consistent with this code and applicable federal or state law or under rules adopted by an investigating agency: (1) a report of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect made under this chapter and the identity of the person making the report; and (2) except as otherwise provided in this section, the files, reports, records, communications, audiotapes, videotapes, and working papers used or developed in an investigation under this chapter or in providing services as a result of an investigation. See id. § 261.201(a). You assert section 261.201(a) for some of the remaining information. Upon review, we find the information we have marked was used or developed in investigations of alleged or suspected child abuse for purposes of section 261.201. See id. § 261.001(1) (defining "abuse" for purposes of chapter 261 of Family Code); see also id. § 101.003(a) (defining "child" for purposes of this section as person under 18 years of age who is not and has not been married or who has not had disabilities of minority removed for general purposes). Thus, we conclude this information is subject to section 261.201(a). You have not indicated the city has adopted a rule that governs the release of the information at issue in this instance; therefore, we assume that no such regulation exists. Given that assumption, we conclude this information is confidential under section 261.201(a) of the Family Code. See Open Records Decision No. 440 at 2 (1986) (predecessor statute). Accordingly, the information we have marked must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201(a) of the Family Code. (3) Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the Medical Practice Act (the "MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides in part: (b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter. (c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained. Occ. Code § 159.002(b)-(c). We note some of the remaining information is confidential under section 159.002. This office has concluded that the protection afforded by section 159.002 extends only to records created by either a physician or someone under the supervision of a physician. See Open Records Decision Nos. 487 (1987), 370 (1983), 343 (1982). Medical records must be released upon the patient's signed, written consent, provided the consent specifies (1) the information to be covered by the release, (2) reasons or purposes for the release, and (3) the person to whom the information is to be released. See Occ. Code §§ 159.004, .005. Any subsequent release of medical records must be consistent with the purposes for which the governmental body obtained the records. See id. § 159.002(c); Open Records Decision No. 565 at 7 (1990). Upon review, we have marked medical records that are subject to the MPA. Accordingly, this information may only be released in accordance with the MPA. (4) Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information if it (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be established. Id. at 681-82. The type of information considered highly intimate or embarrassing by the Texas Supreme Court in Industrial Foundation included information relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. Id. at 683. In Open Records Decision No. 393 (1983), this office concluded that, generally, only that information which either identifies or tends to identify a victim of sexual assault or other sex-related offense may be withheld under common-law privacy. However, a governmental body is required to withhold an entire report when identifying information is inextricably intertwined with other releasable information or when the requestor knows the identity of the alleged victim. See Open Records Decision Nos. 440 (detailed descriptions of serious sexual offenses must be withheld), 393 at 2, 339 (1982). This office has also found that some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses are excepted from required disclosure under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision No. 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps). Generally, only highly intimate information that implicates the privacy of an individual is withheld. However, in certain instances, where it is demonstrated that the requestor knows the identity of the individual involved, as well as the nature of certain incidents, the entire report must be withheld to protect the individual's privacy. In this instance, although you claim some of the remaining information is protected in its entirety by common-law privacy, you have not demonstrated, nor does it otherwise appear, this is a situation in which any of the information at issue must be withheld in its entirety on the basis of common-law privacy. However, upon review, we agree that portions of the remaining information are highly intimate or embarrassing and of no legitimate public concern. Accordingly, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. The city has failed to demonstrate, however, how any of the remaining information at issue is highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate public concern. Therefore, the city may not withhold any of this information under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. We note portions of the remaining information are subject to section 552.130(a)(2) of the Government Code. (5) This section provides that information relating to a motor vehicle title or registration issued by a Texas agency, or an agency of another state or country, is excepted from public release. Gov't Code § 552.130(a)(2). Therefore, the city must withhold the license plate numbers we have marked under section 552.130(a)(2) of the Government Code. (6) In summary, with the exception of basic information, which the city states has been released, the city may withhold the information we have marked under sections 552.108(a)(1) and 552.108(a)(2) of the Government Code. The city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with sections 58.007 and 261.201 of the Family Code. The medical records we have marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. The city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. The city must withhold the license plate numbers we have marked under section 552.130(a)(2) of the Government Code. The city must release the remaining information. (7) This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Kenneth Leland Conyer Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division KLC/tch Ref: ID# 459831 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. You inform us that the city sought and received clarification from the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.222(b) (stating if information requested is unclear to governmental body or if large amount of information has been requested, governmental body may ask requestor to clarify or narrow request, but may not inquire into purpose for which information will be used). You also inform us that the city provided the requestor with an estimate of charges and a request for a deposit for payment of those charges on November 14, 2011. See id. §§ 552.2615, .263(a). You state the city received a deposit for payment of the anticipated costs on June 7, 2012. Thus, June 7, 2012, is the date on which the city is deemed to have received the request. See id. § 552.263(e) (if governmental body requires deposit or bond for anticipated costs pursuant to section 552.263 of the Government Code, request for information is considered to have been received on date that governmental body receives deposit or bond). 2. We assume the "representative sample" of information submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent those records contain substantially different types of information than those submitted to this office. 3. As our ruling for this information is dispositive, we need not address your argument against its disclosure. 4. As our ruling for this information is dispositive, we need not address your argument against its disclosure. 5. The Office of the Attorney General will raise mandatory exceptions on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. See Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987). 6. We note Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009) is a previous determination to all governmental bodies authorizing them to withhold ten categories of information without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision, including a Texas license plate number, under section 552.130(a)(2) of the Government Code. 7. We note the information being released includes a social security number. Section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. See Gov't Code § 552.147(b).
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |