Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

April 4, 2012

Mr. Andy Joslin

City Manager

The City of Floresville

1120 D Street

Floresville, Texas 78114

OR2012-04887

Dear Mr. Joslin:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 449777.

The City of Floresville (the "city") received a request for thirteen categories of information related to the city's holiday extravaganza on specified dates at a specified location. You indicate the city does not maintain information responsive to some of the requested categories. (1) You state that the city will release some of the requested information to the requestor. You claim that portions of the submitted information are excepted from disclosure under section 552.136 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, you acknowledge some of the submitted information consists information subject to section 552.022(a)(3) of the Government Code, which provides that "information in an account, voucher, or contract relating to the receipt or expenditure of public or other funds by a governmental body" is subject to required public disclosure unless it is made confidential under this chapter or "other law." See Gov't Code § 552.022(a)(3). Thus, we will address your argument under section 552.136 of the Government Code, which makes information confidential under the Act.

Section 552.136 of the Government Code provides "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number that is collected, assembled, or maintained by or for a governmental body is confidential." Id. § 552.136(b). Accordingly, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.136.

Finally, some of the remaining information appears to be protected by copyright. A custodian of public records must comply with the copyright law and is not required to furnish copies of records that are copyrighted. Open Records Decision No. 180 at 3 (1977). A governmental body must allow inspection of copyrighted materials unless an exception applies to the information. Id.; see Open Records Decision No. 109 (1975). If a member of the public wishes to make copies of copyrighted materials, the person must do so unassisted by the governmental body. In making copies, the member of the public assumes the duty of compliance with the copyright law and the risk of a copyright infringement suit.

In summary, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.136. The city must release the remaining information, but any information protected by copyright may only be released in accordance with copyright law.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

Sarah Casterline

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

SEC/som

Ref: ID# 449777

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. The Act does not require a governmental body to release information that did not exist when a request for information was received or to prepare new information in response to a request. See Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266, 267-68 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd); Open Records Decision Nos. 605 at 2 (1992), 452 at 3 (1986), 362 at 2 (1983).

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs