 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
 |
March 30, 2012 Ms. Linda Pemberton Paralegal Office of the City Attorney City of Killeen P.O. Box 1329 Killeen, Texas 76540-1329 OR2012-04683 Dear Ms. Pemberton: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 449119 (W007125). The City of Killeen (the "city") received a request for information pertaining to calls regarding neglect of horses and goats, a named individual, and two addresses. You indicate the city is releasing some information to the requestor. You claim some of the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (1) Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. The common-law informer's privilege, incorporated into the Act by section 552.101, has long been recognized by Texas courts. See Aguilar v. State, 444 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Hawthorne v. State, 10 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928). This privilege protects from disclosure the identities of persons who report activities over which the governmental body has criminal or quasi-criminal law-enforcement authority, provided the subject of the information does not already know the informer's identity. Open Records Decision Nos. 515 at 3 (1988), 208 at 1-2 (1978). It protects the identities of individuals who report violations of statutes to the police or similar law-enforcement agencies, as well as those who report violations of statutes with civil or criminal penalties to "administrative officials having a duty of inspection or of law enforcement within their particular spheres." Open Records Decision No. 279 at 2 (1981) (citing 8 John H. Wigmore, Evidence in Trials at Common Law, § 2374, at 767 (McNaughton rev. ed. 1961)). The report must be of a violation of a criminal or civil statute. See Open Records Decision Nos. 582 at 2 (1990), 515 at 4-5. The privilege excepts an informer's statement only to the extent necessary to protect the informer's identity. See Open Records Decision No. 549 at 5 (1990). Although you state activity card numbers A11-040694-1 and A11-039744-1 relate to suspected violations of city ordinances, you have not identified the ordinances at issue, nor have you explained whether the violations carry civil or criminal penalties. Therefore, no portion of activity card numbers A11-040694-1 and A11-039744-1 may be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with the common-law informer's privilege. As you raise no additional exception to disclosure of activity card numbers A11-040694-1 and A11-039744-1, they must be released. Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). A governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why this exception is applicable to the information at issue. See id. §§ 552.108(a)(1), .301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). You state activity card numbers A11-041206-1 and A11-040696-1 relate to prosecutions pending before the city's Municipal Court. Based on your representations and our review, we find that release of activity card numbers A11-041206-1 and A11-040696-1 would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime. See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975) (court delineates law enforcement interests that are present in active cases), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976). Accordingly, the city may withhold activity card numbers A11-041206-1 and A11-040696-1 under section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code. In summary, the city may withhold activity card numbers A11-041206-1 and A11-040696-1 under section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Ana Carolina Vieira Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division ACV/ag Ref: ID# 449119 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
1. We assume the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of
the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records
letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the
extent those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |