![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
February 2, 2012 Ms. Donna L. Johnson Counsel for the City of Dickinson Olson & Olson, L.L.P. Wortham Tower, Suite 600 2727 Allen Parkway Houston, Texas 77019-2133 OR2012-01699 Dear Ms. Johnson: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 444266 (City Ref. No. DCK - WIL). The City of Dickinson (the "city") received a request for all records pertaining to a former city employee. You state you will withhold the responsive L-2 and L-3 declarations, driver's license numbers, and access device information pursuant to the previous determination issued in Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009) (1) and social security numbers pursuant to section 552.147 of the Government Code. (2) You claim portions of the submitted information are excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.102, and 552.117 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information that other statutes make confidential, such as the Medical Practice Act (the "MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. See Occ. Code §§ 151.001-165.160. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides, in part: (b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter. (c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained. Id. § 159.002(b), (c). Information subject to the MPA includes both medical records and information obtained from those medical records. See id. §§ 159.002, .004; Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991). This office has concluded the protection afforded by section 159.002 extends only to records created by either a physician or someone under the supervision of a physician. See Open Records Decision Nos. 487 (1987), 370 (1983), 343 (1982). This office has also determined when a file is created as the result of a hospital stay, all of the documents in the file that relate to diagnosis and treatment constitute either physician-patient communications or records of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that are created or maintained by a physician. See Open Records Decision No. 546 (1990). Upon review, we have marked the medical records that are subject to the MPA. Accordingly, the medical records we have marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that is (1) highly intimate or embarrassing, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be demonstrated. See id. at 681-82. This office has found personal financial information not relating to the financial transaction between an individual and a governmental body is excepted from required public disclosure under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 600 (1992) (employee's designation of retirement beneficiary, choice of insurance carrier, election of optional coverages, direct deposit authorization, forms allowing employee to allocate pretax compensation to group insurance, health care or dependent care), 545 (1990) (deferred compensation information, participation in voluntary investment program, election of optional insurance coverage, mortgage payments, assets, bills, and credit history), 523 (1989) (common-law privacy protects credit reports, financial statements, and other personal financial information), 373 (1983) (common-law privacy protects assets and income source information). Upon review, we find portions of the submitted information, which you have marked, are highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate public concern. Thus, the information you have marked must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. (3) Section 552.102(a) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information in a personnel file, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." Gov't Code § 552.102(a). The Texas Supreme Court recently held section 552.102(a) excepts from disclosure the dates of birth of state employees in the payroll database of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Tex. Comptroller of Pub. Accounts v. Attorney Gen. of Tex., No. 08-0172, 2010 WL 4910163 (Tex. Dec. 3, 2010). Having carefully reviewed the information at issue, we find the dates of birth of a public employee you have marked must be withheld under section 552.102(a) of the Government Code. Section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure the home address, home telephone number, emergency contact information, social security number, and family member information of a peace officer, regardless of whether the peace officer complies with sections 552.024 or 552.1175. Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(2). Section 552.117(a)(2) adopts the definition of peace officer found at article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, we are unable to determine from the information provided whether the individual whose information is at issue is a currently licensed peace officer. With the exception of what we have marked for release, to the extent that the information you have marked under section 552.117, as well as the additional information we have marked, relates to a peace officer, this information must be withheld under section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code. If this individual is not a currently licensed peace officer, section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code may apply to the information at issue. Section 552.117(a)(1) excepts the home address and telephone number, emergency contact information, social security number, and family member information of a current or former employee of a governmental body who requests that this information be kept confidential under section 552.024. Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(1). Whether a particular piece of information is protected by section 552.117(a)(1) must be determined at the time the request for it is made. See Open Records Decision No. 530 at 5 (1989). Thus, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(1) if the individual in question elected confidentiality under section 552.024 prior to the date on which the request for this information was made. With the exception of what we have marked for release, to the extent the marked information relates to a current or former employee who timely elected confidentiality under section 552.024, the marked information must be withheld under section 552.117(a)(1). In summary, the medical records we have marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. The city must withhold the information marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy and the dates of birth marked under section 552.102 of the Government Code. With the exception of what we have marked for release, to the extent it pertains to a currently licensed peace officer, the city must withhold the information we have marked, as well as the information you have marked, pursuant to section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code. With the exception of what we have marked for release, to the extent the marked information pertains to an employee who timely elected to keep his personal information confidential, the city must withhold the information you have marked, and the additional information we have marked, under section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Jonathan Miles Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JM/eb Ref: ID# 444266 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. Open Records Decision No. 684 is a previous determination to all governmental bodies authorizing them to withhold ten categories of information, including L-2 and L-3 declarations under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 1701.306 of the Occupations Code, Texas driver's license numbers under section 552.130 of the Government Code, and access device numbers under section 552.136 of the Government Code, without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision. However, on September 1, 2011, the Texas legislature amended sections 552.130 and 552.136 to allow a governmental body to redact the information described in subsections 552.130(a)(1) and (a)(3) and 552.136(b) without the necessity of seeking a decision from the attorney general. See Gov't Code § 552.130(c), .136(c). If a governmental body redacts such information, it must notify the requestor in accordance with sections 552.130(e) and 552.136(e). See id.. §§ 552.130(d)-(e), .136(d)-(e). Thus, the statutory amendments to sections 552.130 and 552.136 of the Government Code superceded Open Records Decision No. 684 on September 1, 2011. Therefore, a governmental body may only redact information subject to subsections 552.130(a)(1) and (a)(3) and 552.136(b) in accordance with sections 552.130 and 552.136, not Open Records Decision No. 684. 2. Section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. Gov't Code § 552.147(b). 3. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining argument for this information.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |