![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
February 1, 2012 Ms. Paige C. Kyle Walsh, Anderson, Brown, Gallegos and Green, P.C. P.O. Box 460606 San Antonio, Texas 78246 OR2012-01655 Dear Ms. Kyle: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 444989. The Judson Independent School District (the "district"), which you represent, received a request for a named individual's personnel files for the 2011-2012 school year, including any and all disciplinary memos, counseling forms, complaints, or grievances filed against the named individual for a specified time period. You state the district is releasing some of the requested information. We note the district has redacted information pursuant to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA"), section 1232(g) of title 20 of the United States Code. (1) You state the district will redact the home address and home telephone number of a district employee pursuant to section 552.024(c) of the Government Code. (3) You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.103 and 552.135 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. We have also received and considered comments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (interested third party may submit comments stating why information should or should not be released). You claim that the information labeled as AG-0001 through AG-0014 is protected under section 552.103 of the Government Code. Section 552.103 provides, in part: (a) Information is excepted from [required public disclosure] if it is information relating to litigation of a civil or criminal nature to which the state or a political subdivision is or may be a party or to which an officer or employee of the state or a political subdivision, as a consequence of the person's office or employment, is or may be a party. . . . (c) Information relating to litigation involving a governmental body or an officer or employee of a governmental body is excepted from disclosure under Subsection (a) only if the litigation is pending or reasonably anticipated on the date that the requestor applies to the officer for public information for access to or duplication of the information. Id. § 552.103(a), (c). A governmental body that claims an exception to disclosure under section 552.103 has the burden of providing relevant facts and documentation sufficient to establish the applicability of this exception to the information that it seeks to withhold. To meet this burden, the governmental body must demonstrate that (1) litigation is pending or reasonably anticipated on the date the governmental body receives the request for information, and (2) the information at issue is related to the pending or anticipated litigation. See Univ. of Tex. Law Sch. v. Tex. Legal Found., 958 S.W.2d 479, 481 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, no pet.); Heard v. Houston Post Co., 684 S.W.2d 210, 212 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Open Records Decision No. 551 at 4 (1990). The governmental body must meet both prongs of this test for information to be excepted from disclosure under section 552.103(a). See ORD 551 at 4. This office has long held that for the purposes of section 552.103, "litigation" includes "contested cases" conducted in a quasi-judicial forum. See Open Records Decision Nos. 474 (1987), 368 (1983), 336 (1982), 301 (1982). Likewise, "contested cases" conducted under the Texas Administrative Procedure Act, chapter 2001 of the Government Code, constitute "litigation" for purposes of section 552.103. See Open Records Decision Nos. 588 (1991) (concerning former State Board of Insurance proceeding), 301 (concerning hearing before Public Utilities Commission). In determining whether an administrative proceeding is conducted in a quasi-judicial forum, this office has focused on the following factors: (1) whether the dispute is, for all practical purposes, litigated in an administrative proceeding where (a) discovery takes place, (b) evidence is heard, (c) factual questions are resolved, and (d) a record is made; and (2) whether the proceeding is an adjudicative forum of first jurisdiction, i.e., whether judicial review of the proceeding in district court is an appellate review and not the forum for resolving a controversy on the basis of evidence. See ORD 588. You state, and the request for information indicates, a district employee filed a complaint against the requestor's client. You explain that grievances filed with the district are "litigation" because the district follows administrative procedures in handling such disputes. You state the district's grievance process is a multi-level hearing process wherein various administrators initially hear the grievance, and the district's Board of Trustees ultimately hears the grievance. You explain that during these hearings the grievant is allowed to be represented by counsel and present evidence to the district. You state the grievant must complete the district's grievance process in order to exhaust his administrative remedies before he can appeal to either the Texas Education Agency or a court of competent jurisdiction. Based on your representations, we find you have demonstrated that the district's administrative procedure for disputes is conducted in a quasi-judicial forum and, thus, constitutes litigation for purposes of section 552.103. We understand, and the request for information indicates, the grievance at issue was filed against the requestor's client before the instant request was received. Thus, we determine that the district was involved in pending litigation at the time it received the instant request for information. You state the information at issue, which consists of the complaint filed against the requestor's client, including the supporting documentation and statements, directly relates to the pending litigation against the district. Accordingly, the district may withhold the information labeled as AG-0001 through AG-0014 under section 552.103 of the Government Code. (4) We note that once the information has been obtained by all parties to the pending litigation, through discovery or otherwise, no section 552.103(a) interest exists with respect to that information. Open Records Decision No. 349 at 2 (1982). We also note that the applicability of section 552.103(a) ends when the litigation is concluded or is no longer reasonably anticipated. Attorney General Opinion MW-575 (1982) at 2; Open Records Decision Nos. 350 at 3 (1982), 349 at 2. Section 552.135 of the Government Code provides, in pertinent part: (a) "Informer" means a student or former student or an employee or former employee of a school district who has furnished a report of another person's possible violation of criminal, civil, or regulatory law to the school district or the proper regulatory enforcement authority. (b) An informer's name or information that would substantially reveal the identity of an informer is excepted from [required public disclosure]. Gov't Code § 552.135(a)-(b). Because the legislature limited the protection of section 552.135 to the identity of a person who reports a possible violation of "law," a school district that seeks to withhold information under the exception must clearly identify to this office the specific civil, criminal, or regulatory law that is alleged to have been violated. See id. § 552.301(e)(1)(A). We note that section 552.135 protects an informer's identity, but it does not generally encompass protection for witness statements. In this instance, you assert section 552.135 protects the identities of the district employees who made reports of violations of law. However, we find that you have not identified any specific civil, criminal, or regulatory law that is alleged to have been violated. We therefore conclude that the district may not withhold any of the remaining information under section 552.135 of the Government Code. In summary, the district may withhold the information labeled as AG-0001 through AG-0014 under section 552.103 of the Government Code. The district must release the remaining information. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Lindsay E. Hale Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division LEH/ag Ref: ID# 444989 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
1. We note the United States Department of Education Family Policy Compliance Office (the "DOE")
has informed this office that FERPA does not permit a state educational agency or institution to disclose to this
office, without parental or an adult student's consent, unredacted, personally identifiable information contained
in education records for the purpose of our review in the open records ruling process under the Act. (2)
2. A copy of this letter may be found on the Office of the Attorney General's website:
http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/20060725usdoe.pdf.
§ " "
' '
3. Section 552.117 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure the home addresses and telephone
numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of current or former officials or employees
of a governmental body. Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(1). Section 552.024 of the Government Code authorizes
a governmental body to withhold information subject to section 552.117 without requesting a decision from this
office if the current or former official or employee chooses not to allow public access to the information. See
id. § 552.024(c).
4. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining argument for this information.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |