Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

January 23, 2012

Ms. Cynthia Villarreal-Reyna

Director

Texas Department of Insurance

P.O. Box 149104

Austin, Texas 78714-9104

OR2012-01019

Dear Ms. Villarreal-Reyna:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 445366 (ORR# 120038).

The Texas Department of Insurance (the "department") received a request for specified complaint files. You state some of the requested information has been released. You do not take a position as to whether the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under the Act. However, you state, and provide documentation showing, you notified Accurate Applied Construction, Inc.; American Service Insurance Company; Anchor General Insurance Company; NAFTA General Agency, Inc.; State National Insurance Company, Inc.; Underwriters MGA Inc.; and a number of named individuals of the department's receipt of the request for information and of the right of each to submit arguments to this office as to why the requested information should not be released to the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d); see also Open Records Decision No. 542 at 3 (1990) (statutory predecessor to section 552.305 permits governmental body to rely on interested third party to raise and explain applicability of exception in the Act in certain circumstances). We have reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, the department acknowledges, and we agree, it failed to comply with the procedural requirements of section 552.301 of the Government Code. A governmental body's failure to comply with the procedural requirements of section 552.301 results in the legal presumption that the requested information is public and must be released unless the governmental body demonstrates a compelling reason to withhold the information from disclosure. See Gov't Code § 552.302; Simmons v. Kuzmich, 166 S.W.3d 342, 350 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); Hancock v. State Bd. of Ins., 797 S.W.2d 379, 381 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ); see also Open Records Decision No. 630 (1994). The presumption that information is public under section 552.302 can generally be overcome by demonstrating the information is confidential by law or third-party interests are at stake. See Open Records Decision Nos. 630 at 3 (1994), 325 at 2 (1982). Because the interests of third parties are at stake and sections 552.101, 552.136, and 552.137 of the Government Code can provide compelling reasons to overcome this presumption, we will consider whether the third-party interests and these sections require the department to withhold the submitted information. (1)

An interested third party is allowed ten business days after the date of its receipt of the governmental body's notice under section 552.305(d) to submit its reasons, if any, as to why requested information relating to it should be withheld from disclosure. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d)(2)(B). As of the date of this letter, none of the interested third parties has submitted to this office any reasons explaining why the requested information should not be released. We thus have no basis for concluding any portion of the submitted information constitutes proprietary information of any interested third party, and the department may not withhold any portion of the submitted information on that basis. See Open Records Decision Nos. 661 at 5-6 (1999) (to prevent disclosure of commercial or financial information, party must show by specific factual evidence, not conclusory or generalized allegations, that release of requested information would cause that party substantial competitive harm), 552 at 5 (1990) (party must establish prima facie case that information is trade secret), 542 at 3.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). Prior decisions of this office have found financial information relating only to an individual ordinarily satisfies the first requirement of the test for common-law privacy but there is a legitimate public interest in the essential facts about a financial transaction between an individual and a governmental body. See Open Records Decision Nos. 600 (1992), 545 (1990), 373 (1983). For example, information related to an individual's mortgage payments, assets, bills, and credit history is generally protected by the common-law right to privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 545, 523 (1989); see also ORD 600 (personal financial information includes choice of particular insurance carrier). However, the doctrine of common-law privacy protects the privacy interests of individuals, not of corporations or other types of business organizations. See Open Records Decision Nos. 620 (1993) (corporation has no right to privacy), 192 (1978) (right to privacy is designed primarily to protect human feelings and sensibilities, rather than property, business, or other pecuniary interests); see also FCC v. AT&T Inc., 131 S.Ct. 1177, 1185 (2011) ("The protection in FOIA against disclosure of law enforcement information on the ground that it would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy does not extend to corporations."). The submitted documents contain personal financial information, and the public does not have a legitimate interest in it. See Open Records Decision Nos. 620 (1993), 600. We have marked the information that the department must withhold under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy.

Section 552.136 of the Government Code provides the following:

(a) In this section, "access device" means a card, plate, code, account number, personal identification number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier or means of account access that alone or in conjunction with another access device may be used to:

(1) obtain money, goods, services, or another thing of value; or

(2) initiate a transfer of funds other than a transfer originated solely by paper instrument.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number that is collected, assembled, or maintained by or for a governmental body is confidential.

Gov't Code § 552.136. This office has determined an insurance policy number is an access device number for purposes of section 552.136. See id. § 552.136(a); Open Records Decision No. 684 at 9 (2009). The department must withhold the insurance policy, bank account, and bank routing numbers we have marked under section 552.136.

Section 552.137 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "an e-mail address of a member of the public that is provided for the purpose of communicating electronically with a governmental body" unless the member of the public consents to its release or the e-mail address is of a type specifically excluded by subsection (c). See id. § 552.137(a)-(c). Section 552.137 does not apply to a government employee's work e-mail address because such an address is not that of the employee as a "member of the public," but is instead the address of the individual as a government employee. The e-mail addresses at issue do not appear to be of a type specifically excluded by section 552.137(c). You do not inform us a member of the public has affirmatively consented to the release of any e-mail address contained in the submitted materials. Therefore, the department must withhold the e-mail addresses we have marked under section 552.137. (2)

To conclude, the department must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy and under sections 552.136 and 552.137 of the Government Code. The department must release the remaining information.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

James L. Coggeshall

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

JLC/som

Ref: ID# 445366

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Lupita Pelache

Underwriters MGA Inc.

1210 West Expressway 83, Suite 7

Pharr, Texas 78577

(w/o enclosures)

CT Corporation System

For American Service Insurance Company

350 North Saint Paul Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Leah Bellamy

Anchor General Insurance Company

1614 Sidney Baker Street

Kerrville, Texas 78028-2640

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Daniel T. Hernandez

NAFTA General Agency, Inc.

P.O. Box 4532

Brownsville, Texas 78523-4532

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Kevin D. Williams, Sr.

Accurate Applied Construction, Inc.

3736 Club Rancho Drive

Palmdale, California 93551

(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Barbara Savaglio

2727 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 100

San Diego, California 92108

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Kevin Woolfolk

Wilber & Associates

816 Eldorado Road, Suite 1

Bloomington, Illinois 61704

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Terry L. Ledbetter

State National Insurance Company

1900 L Don Dodson Drive

Bedford, Texas 76021

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. David Calvillo

Calvillo Law

Building B, Suite 200

6316 North 10th street,

McAllen, Texas 78504

(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Joseph Monahan

1303 Calle del Norte, Suite 900

Laredo, Texas 78041

(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Sarah A. Nicolas

Rodriguez & Rodriguez PLLC

Greystone Plaza

7200 North Mopac Expressway Suite 430

Austin, Texas 78737

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. The Office of the Attorney General will raise mandatory exceptions on behalf of a governmental body. See Open Records Decision Nos. 481 at 2 (1987), 480 at 5 (1987); see, e.g., Open Records Decision No. 470 at 2 (1987) (because release of confidential information could impair rights of third parties and because improper release constitutes a misdemeanor, attorney general will raise predecessor statute of section 552.101 on behalf of governmental bodies).

2. This office issued Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009), a previous determination to all governmental bodies authorizing them to withhold ten categories of information, including an e-mail address of a member of the public under section 552.137 of the Government Code, without the necessity of requesting an attorney general opinion.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs