![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
January 12, 2012 Mr. B. Chase Griffith For City of McKinney Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P. 740 East Campbell Road, Suite 800 Richardson, Texas 75081 OR2012-00622 Dear Mr. Griffith: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 442105 (McKinney ORR# 10-4558). The McKinney Police Department (the "department") received a request for a specified police report. You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from public disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information protected by other statutes, such as section 58.007 of the Family Code. Section 58.007 makes confidential juvenile law enforcement records relating to conduct that occurred on or after September 1, 1997 and reads as follows: (c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), law enforcement records and files concerning a child and information stored, by electronic means or otherwise, concerning the child from which a record or file could be generated may not be disclosed to the public and shall be: (1) if maintained on paper or microfilm, kept separate from adult files and records; (2) if maintained electronically in the same computer system as records or files relating to adults, be accessible under controls that are separate and distinct from controls to access electronic data concerning adults; and (3) maintained on a local basis only and not sent to a central state or federal depository, except as provided by Subchapters B, D, and E. Fam. Code § 58.007(c). For purposes of section 58.007(c), "child" means a person who is ten years of age or older and under seventeen years of age. See id. § 51.02(2). The submitted information involves delinquent conduct and conduct indicating a need for supervision that occurred after September 1, 1997. See id. § 51.03 (defining "delinquent conduct" and "conduct indicating a need for supervision" for purposes of Fam. Code § 58.007). It does not appear any of the exceptions in section 58.007 apply. Therefore, we conclude the submitted information is generally confidential pursuant to section 58.007(c) of the Family Code. We note, however, the requestor is an investigator with United States Office of Personnel Management ("OPM"). OPM is authorized to perform background investigations of prospective federal employees to ensure applicants have not broken the law or engaged in other conduct making them ineligible for federal employment. See Mittleman v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 76 F.3d 1240, 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1996); see also 5 U.S.C. §§ 3301 (president may prescribe regulations for admission of individuals into civil service), 1304 (investigations conducted by OPM), 1104 (president may delegate personnel management functions to OPM); 5 C.F.R. pts. 731, 732, 736 (authorizing OPM to investigate applicants for federal employment). OPM is subject to Executive Order Number 10,450, which provides that "[t]he appointment of each civilian officer or employee in any department or agency of the Government shall be made subject to investigation." Exec. Order No. 10,450, § 3, 18 Fed. Reg. 2489 (Apr. 27, 1953), reprinted as amended in 5 U.S.C. § 7311 (2000). While the scope of the investigation depends on the relation of the employment to national security, "in no event shall the investigation include less than a national agency check (including a check for the fingerprint files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation), and written inquiries to appropriate local law enforcement agencies." Id. OPM has a right to the criminal history record information ("CHRI") of state and local criminal justice agencies when it receives the consent of the individual being investigated for release of such information. See 5 U.S.C. § 9101(b)(1), (c). CHRI is defined as "information collected by criminal justice agencies on individuals consisting of identifiable descriptions and notations of arrests, indictments, informations, or other formal criminal charges, and any disposition arising therefrom, sentencing, correction supervision and release," but does not include "identification information such as fingerprint records to the extent that such information does not indicate involvement in the criminal justice system" or "records of a State or locality sealed pursuant to law from access by State and local criminal justice agencies of that State or locality." 5 U.S.C. § 9101(a)(2). In this instance, the requestor has not indicated that he is conducting a background investigation for a national security or public trust position. Furthermore, the requestor has not submitted written consent from the individual under investigation for the release of the submitted information. Therefore, we must rule conditionally on this matter. If the requestor is seeking the requested information as part of an investigation conducted on behalf of the OPM, and the named individual has provided OPM with consent for the release of CHRI, the requestor has a right of access to any CHRI held by the department. In addition, we conclude that such a right of access is required under federal law, which preempts the state confidentiality provision you claim. Id. § 9101(b)(4) (section 9101 "shall apply notwithstanding any other provision of law . . . of any State"); see also English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 79 (1990) (noting that state law is preempted to extent it actually conflicts with federal law); Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCC, 476 U.S. 355, 369 (1986) (noting that federal agency acting within scope of its congressionally delegated authority may preempt state regulation). Therefore, to the extent the requestor seeks the submitted information as part of an investigation conducted on behalf of the OPM, and the named individual has provided OPM with consent, the department must release any CHRI to the requestor. The department must withhold the remaining portion of the submitted information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 58.007(c) of the Family Code. However, if the requestor is not seeking the submitted information as part of an investigation conducted on behalf of the OPM, or the named individual has not consented to release of CHRI, the submitted information is confidential under section 58.007(c) and must be withheld in its entirety under section 552.101 of the Government Code. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Sean Opperman Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division SO/dls Ref: ID# 442105 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |