![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
December 1, 2011 Ms. Tiffany N. Evans Assistant City Attorney Legal Department City of Houston P.O. Box 368 Houston, Texas 77001-0368 OR2011-17749 Dear Ms. Evans: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 437592 (Houston GC 18967). The Houston Police Department (the "department") received a request for the calls for service from a specified address using a specified telephone number during specified time periods and copies of the audio and printed statement for the calls made during a specified time period. You state the department will release some of the requested information. You claim that some of the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information. We have also received and considered comments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (providing that interested party may submit written comments regarding why information should or should not be released). Initially, we note the department did not comply with its deadlines under section 552.301 of the Government Code in requesting this decision. Section 552.301 prescribes procedures a governmental body must follow in asking this office to determine whether requested information is excepted from public disclosure. See id. § 552.301(a). Section 552.301(b) requires the governmental body to ask for the attorney general's decision and claim its exceptions to disclosure not later than the tenth business day after the date of its receipt of the written request for information. See id. § 552.301(b). Section 552.301(e) requires the governmental body to submit to this office, not later than the fifteenth business day after the date of its receipt of the request, (1) written comments stating why the governmental body's claimed exceptions apply to the information at issue; (2) a copy of the request for information; (3) a signed statement of the date of the governmental body's receipt of the request or evidence sufficient to establish the date of receipt; and (4) the specific information at issue or representative samples if the information is voluminous. See id. § 552.301(e)(1)(A)-(D). Section 552.302 of the Government Code provides that if a governmental body fails to comply with section 552.301, the requested information is presumed to be subject to required public disclosure and must be released, unless there is a compelling reason to withhold any of the information. See id. § 552.302; Simmons v. Kuzmich, 166 S.W.3d 342 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); Hancock v. State Bd. of Ins., 797 S.W.2d 379, 381 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ). You inform us the department received the instant request for information on July14, 2011; therefore, the department's deadlines under subsections 552.301(b) and 552.301(e) were July 28 and August 4, respectively. You requested this decision by United States mail meter-marked September 23. Thus, the department did not comply with section 552.301, and the submitted information is therefore presumed to be public under section 552.302. This statutory presumption can generally be overcome when information is confidential by law or third-party interests are at stake. See Open Records Decision Nos. 630 at 3 (1994), 325 at 2 (1982). Because a claim under section 552.101 of the Government Code can provide a compelling reason for non-disclosure under section 552.302, we will consider your assertion of that exception. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information protected by other statutes, such as section 261.201 of the Family Code, which provides, in relevant part: (a) [T]he following information is confidential, is not subject to public release under [the Act], and may be disclosed only for purposes consistent with this code and applicable federal or state law or under rules adopted by an investigating agency: (1) a report of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect made under this chapter and the identity of the person making the report; and (2) except as otherwise provided in this section, the files, reports, records, communications, audiotapes, videotapes, and working papers used or developed in an investigation under this chapter or in providing services as a result of an investigation. Fam. Code § 261.201(a). You assert portions of the submitted information are confidential because they relate to investigations of alleged or suspected child abuse or neglect. Upon review, we find the information we have marked pertains to investigations of alleged or suspected child abuse or neglect and falls within the scope of section 261.201 of the Family Code. See id. §§ 101.003(a) (generally defining "child" for purposes of this section as person under 18 years of age who is not and has not been married or who has not had the disabilities of minority removed for general purposes), 261.001(1), (4) (defining "abuse" and "neglect" for purposes of chapter 261 of the Family Code); see also Penal Code §§ 21.11 (defining "child" for purposes of section 21.11 as a minor younger than 17 years of age), 22.04(c) (defining "child" for purposes of injury to a child as a person 14 years of age or younger), 22.011(c)(1) (defining "child" for purposes of sections 22.011 and 22.021 as "a person younger than 17 years of age"), .021(b)(1). As you do not indicate that the department has adopted a rule that governs the release of this type of information, we assume that no such regulation exists. Given that assumption, and based on our review, we determine the information we have marked is confidential pursuant to section 261.201 of the Family Code. See Open Records Decision No. 440 at 2 (1986) (predecessor statute). Accordingly, the department must withhold the information we have marked from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code. However, we find none of the remaining information pertains to an investigation of the alleged or suspected abuse of a child for the purposes of chapter 261 of the Family Code. As such, we find you have failed to adequately demonstrate how the information is confidential under section 261.201. We conclude the department may not withhold any of the remaining information under section 552.101 of the Government Code on this basis. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the common-law right of privacy, which protects information if it (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be established. Id. at 681-82. The type of information considered intimate or embarrassing by the Texas Supreme Court in Industrial Foundation included information relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. Id. at 683. This office has found that some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses are excepted from required public disclosure under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision No. 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps). Additionally, information that either identifies or tends to identify a victim of sexual assault or other sex-related offense must be withheld under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 440, 393 (1983), 339 (1982). Upon review, we find that the information we have marked is highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate concern to the public. Accordingly, the department must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. However, we find the remaining information you seek to withhold does not identify, nor have you identified, any individual to whom the information might pertain. As such, none of the remaining information implicates the privacy rights of an identified individual. We therefore conclude the department may not withhold any of the remaining information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. In summary, the department must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code and common-law privacy. The department must release the remaining information. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Lindsay E. Hale Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division LEH/em Ref: ID# 437592 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |