![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
May 19, 2011 Mr. B. Chase Griffith Brown & Hofmeister, L.L.P. For City of Ferris 740 East Campbell Road, Suite 800 Richardson, Texas 75081 OR2011-07061 Dear Mr. Giffith: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 417978. The City of Ferris (the "city"), which you represent, received a request for 1) a named police officer's personnel file; 2) all citations issued by another named officer; 3) the policy regarding whether police department employees are required to live within a certain distance of the city; 4) information related to police officers working off duty; 5) the seven step violator contact procedure; and 6) the number of officers previously terminated for misconduct, conduct unbecoming an officer, or association with questionable persons. You state some of the requested information will be released upon payment. You also state the city will redact information pursuant to section 552.147(b) of the Government Code and Open Records Decision No. 670 (2001), which is a previous determination by this office authorizing a governmental body to redact information subject to section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code. (1) You claim the remaining information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.117, 552.130, and 552.137of the Government Code. (2) We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This exception encompasses information other statutes make confidential, such as section 6103(a) of title 26 of the United States Code. Prior decisions of this office have held section 6103(a) renders tax return information confidential. See Attorney General Opinion H-1274 (1978) (tax returns); Open Records Decision No. 600 (1992) (W-4 forms). Section 6103(b) defines the term "return information" as "a taxpayer's identity, the nature, source, or amount of his income, payments, receipts, deductions, exemptions, credits, assets, liabilities, net worth, tax liability, tax withheld, deficiencies, overassessments, or tax payments . . . or any other data, received by, recorded by, prepared by, furnished to, or collected by the Secretary [of the Internal Revenue Service] with respect to a return or with respect to the determination of the existence, or possible existence, of liability . . . for any tax, penalty, interest, fine, forfeiture, or other imposition, or offense[.]" 26 U.S.C. § 6103(b)(2)(A). Federal courts have construed the term "return information" expansively to include any information gathered by the Internal Revenue Service regarding a taxpayer's liability under title 26 of the United States Code. See Mallas v. Kolak, 721 F. Supp 748, 754 (M.D.N.C. 1989), aff'd in part, 993 F.2d 1111 (4th Cir. 1993). Upon review, we find the submitted W-4 forms, which we have marked, constitute tax return information that is confidential under federal law and must be withheld under section 552.101. Section 552.101 also encompasses section 1324a of title 8 of the United States Code. Section 1324a governs I-9 forms and their related documents. This section provides an I-9 form and "any information contained in or appended to such form, may not be used for purposes other than for enforcement of this chapter" and for enforcement of other federal statutes governing crime and criminal investigations. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(b)(5); see also 8 C.F.R. § 274a.2(b)(4). Accordingly, we conclude the I-9 forms we have marked are confidential for purposes of section 552.101 of the Government Code and may only be released in compliance with the federal laws and regulations governing the employment verification system. See 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(b)(1)(B)-(D); 8 C.F.R. § 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A)-(C). Section 552.101 also encompasses section 411.083 of the Government Code, which pertains to criminal history record information ("CHRI") generated by the National Crime Information Center or by the Texas Crime Information Center. Title 28, part 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations governs the release of CHRI that state agencies obtain from the federal government or other states. See Open Records Decision No. 565 (1990). The federal regulations allow each state to follow its individual law with respect to CHRI it generates. See id. Section 411.083 of the Government Code deems confidential CHRI that the Department of Public Safety ("DPS") maintains, except DPS may disseminate this information in accordance with chapter 411, subchapter F of the Government Code. (3) See Gov't Code § 411.083. Sections 411.083(b)(1) and 411.089(a) authorize a criminal justice agency to obtain CHRI; however, a criminal justice agency may only release CHRI to another criminal justice agency for a criminal justice purpose. See id. § 411.089(b)(1). Other entities specified in chapter 411 of the Government Code are entitled to obtain CHRI from DPS or another criminal justice agency; however, those entities may not release CHRI except as provided by chapter 411. See generally id. §§ 411.090-.127. Furthermore, any CHRI obtained from DPS or any other criminal justice agency must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with Government Code chapter 411, subchapter F. However, we note driving record information is not made confidential by the confidentiality provisions that govern CHRI. See id. § 411.082 (2)(B) (definition of CHRI does not include driving record information). We also note section 411.083 does not apply to active warrant information or other information relating to one's current involvement with the criminal justice system. See id. § 411.081(b) (police department allowed to disclose information pertaining to person's current involvement in the criminal justice system). Upon review, we conclude the city must withhold the CHRI we marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with section 411.083 and federal law. However, we find no portion of the remaining information constitutes CHRI and none of it may be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with chapter 411. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses section 58.007 of the Family Code. Juvenile law enforcement records relating to conduct that occurred on or after September 1, 1997 are confidential under section 58.007 of the Family Code. The relevant language of section 58.007(c) reads as follows: (c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), law enforcement records and files concerning a child and information stored, by electronic means or otherwise, concerning the child from which a record or file could be generated may not be disclosed to the public and shall be: (1) if maintained on paper or microfilm, kept separate from adult files and records; (2) if maintained electronically in the same computer system as records or files relating to adults, be accessible under controls that are separate and distinct from controls to access electronic data concerning adults; and (3) maintained on a local basis only and not sent to a central state or federal depository, except as provided by Subchapters B, D, and E. Fam. Code § 58.007(c). For purposes of section 58.007(c), "child" means a person who is ten years of age or older and under seventeen years of age. See id. § 51.02(2). The reports we have marked involve juvenile delinquent conduct that occurred after September 1, 1997. See id. § 51.03 (defining "delinquent conduct" for purposes of Fam. Code § 58.007). It does not appear that any of the exceptions in section 58.007 apply. Therefore, we find the reports we have marked are confidential under section 58.007(c) of the Family Code, and must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the Medical Practice Act (the "MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. See Occ. Code §§ 151.001-165.160. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides, in part: (b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter. (c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained. Id. § 159.002(b), (c). Information that is subject to the MPA includes both medical records and information obtained from those medical records. See id. §§ 159.002, .004; Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991). This office has concluded the protection afforded by section 159.002 extends only to records created by either a physician or someone under the supervision of a physician. See Open Records Decision Nos. 487 (1987), 370 (1983), 343 (1982). We have also found that when a file is created as the result of a hospital stay, all the documents in the file relating to diagnosis and treatment constitute physician-patient communications or "[r]ecords of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that are created or maintained by a physician." Open Records Decision No. 546 (1990). Upon review, we find portions of the submitted information constitute confidential medical records. Thus, the medical records we have marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. See ORD 598. You claim a portion of the remaining information is subject to section 1701.306 of the Occupations Code. Section 552.101 encompasses section 1701.306, which pertains to an L-2 Declaration of Medical Condition and an L-3 Declaration of Psychological and Emotional Health required by the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education ("TCLEOSE"). Section 1701.306 provides as follows: (a) [TCLEOSE] may not issue a license to a person as an officer or county jailer unless the person is examined by:
(1) a licensed psychologist or by a psychiatrist who declares in writing that the person is in satisfactory psychological and emotional health to serve as the type of officer for which a license is sought; and
(2) a licensed physician who declares in writing that the person does not show any trace of drug dependency or illegal drug use after a physical examination, blood test, or other medical test.
(b) An agency hiring a person for whom a license as an officer or county jailer is sought shall select the examining physician and the examining psychologist or psychiatrist. The agency shall prepare a report of each declaration required by Subsection (a) and shall maintain a copy of the report on file in a format readily accessible to the commission. A declaration is not public information. Occ. Code § 1701.306(a), (b). Upon review, we find none of the submitted information consists of L-2 or L-3 declarations. Accordingly, none of the remaining information is confidential under section 1701.306, and the city may not withhold it under section 552.101 on that ground. Section 552.101 also encompasses section 1701.454 of the Occupations Code, which governs the release of reports or statements submitted to TCLEOSE. Section 1701.454 provides as follows: (a) A report or statement submitted to [TCLEOSE] under this subchapter is confidential and is not subject to disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, unless the person resigned or was terminated due to substantiated incidents of excessive force or violations of the law other than traffic offenses. (b) Except as provided by this subchapter, a [TCLEOSE] member or other person may not release the contents of a report or statement submitted under this subchapter. Id. § 1701.454. The responsive information contains F-5 ("Report of Separation of Licensee") reports, which do not indicate the officer at issue resigned or was terminated due to substantiated incidents of excessive force or violations of the law other than traffic offenses. Therefore, the city must withhold the F-5 reports we marked pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 1701.454 of the Occupations Code. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the common-law right of privacy, which protects information that is (1) highly intimate or embarrassing, such that its release would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) not of legitimate concern to the public. See Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be established. See id. at 681-82. We note the doctrine of common-law privacy generally protects the identifying information of juvenile offenders. See Open Records Decision No. 394 (1983); cf. Fam. Code § 58.007. This office has also found an employee's voluntary financial choices are highly intimate and embarrassing for purposes of common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 600 (1992) (personal financial information protected by common-law privacy includes designation of beneficiary of employee's retirement benefits and optional insurance coverage; choice of particular insurance carrier; direct deposit authorization; and forms allowing employee to allocate pretax compensation to group insurance, health care, or dependent care), 545 (1990) (deferred compensation information, participation in voluntary investment program, election of optional insurance coverage, mortgage payments, assets, bills, and credit history). However, there is a legitimate public interest in the essential facts about a financial transaction between an individual and a governmental body. See ORD 600 at 9 (information revealing employee participates in group insurance plan funded partly or wholly by governmental body not excepted from disclosure); see also Open Records Decision Nos. 545 (financial information pertaining to receipt of funds from governmental body or debts owed to governmental body not protected by common-law privacy), 523 (1989). Whether financial information is subject to a legitimate public interest and therefore not protected by common-law privacy must be determined on a case-by-case basis. See Open Records Decision No. 373 (1983). Upon review, we find the information we have marked is highly intimate or embarrassing and of no legitimate concern to the public. Accordingly, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. However, we find you have failed to demonstrate the remaining information is highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate public concern. Therefore, the city may not withhold any of the remaining information on this basis. We note the submitted information includes information that is excepted from disclosure under section 552.102(a) of the Government Code. (4) Section 552.102(a) excepts from disclosure "information in a personnel file, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy." Gov't Code § 552.102(a). The Texas Supreme Court recently held section 552.102(a) excepts from disclosure the dates of birth of state employees in the payroll database of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Tex. Comptroller of Pub. Accounts v. Attorney Gen. of Tex., No. 08-0172, 2010 WL 4910163 (Tex. Dec. 3, 2010). Having carefully reviewed the information at issue, we have marked the information that must be withheld under section 552.102(a) of the Government Code. You assert portions of the remaining information are excepted from disclosure under section 552.117 of the Government Code. Section 552.117(a)(2) excepts from disclosure the home address, home telephone number, social security number, and family member information of a peace officer, as defined by article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(2); Open Records Decision No. 622 (1994); see also ORD 670 at 6 (determining that a governmental body may withhold the home addresses and telephone numbers, personal cellular telephone and pager numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of its peace officers under section 552.117(a)(2) without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision). It is unclear whether the individual whose personal information is at issue is currently a licensed peace officer, as defined by article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Therefore, to the extent the individual at issue is a licensed peace officer, then the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code. If the individual at issue is not a licensed peace officer, then the personal information at issue may be subject to section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. Section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure the home address and telephone number, social security number, and family member information of a current or former official or employee of a governmental body who requests that this information be kept confidential under section 552.024 of the Government Code. See Gov't Code §§ 552.117, .024. Whether a particular item of information is protected by section 552.117(a)(1) must be determined at the time of the governmental body's receipt of the request for the information. See Open Records Decision No. 530 at 5 (1989). Thus, information may only be withheld under section 552.117(a)(1) on behalf of a current or former official or employee who made a request for confidentiality under section 552.024 prior to the date of the governmental body's receipt of the request for the information. To the extent the individual whose personal information is at issue timely requested confidentiality under section 552.024, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(1). Conversely, to the extent this individual did not make a timely election under section 552.024, the city may not withhold the marked information under section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. (5) A portion of the remaining information may be subject to section 552.1175 of the Government Code. Section 552.1175 provides in part: (a) This section applies only to: (1) peace officers as defined by Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure[.] (b) Information that relates to the home address, home telephone number, or social security number of an individual to whom this section applies, or that reveals whether the individual has family members is confidential and may not be disclosed to the public under this chapter if the individual to whom the information relates: (1) chooses to restrict public access to the information; and (2) notifies the governmental body of the individual's choice on a form provided by the governmental body, accompanied by evidence of the individual's status. Gov't Code § 552.1175(a)(1), (b). The remaining information may include addresses and home telephone numbers of peace officers who are not city employees. Thus we must rule conditionally on this information, which we have marked. To the extent these individuals are currently licensed peace officers who elect with the city to restrict public access to their personal information, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.1175. To the extent these individuals are not currently licensed peace officers who elect with the city to restrict public access to their personal information, the city may not withhold the information pertaining to these individuals under section 552.1175. Section 552.130 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information [that] relates to . . . a motor vehicle operator's or driver's license or permit issued by an agency of this state [or] a motor vehicle title or registration issued by an agency of this state." Id. § 552.130(a)(1), (2). Accordingly, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.130. Section 552.137 of the Government Code provides, "an e-mail address of a member of the public that is provided for the purpose of communicating electronically with a governmental body is confidential and not subject to disclosure under [the Act]," unless the owner of the e-mail address has affirmatively consented to its release or the e-mail address is specifically excluded by subsection (c). Id. § 552.137(a)-(c). Upon review, we find the remaining information does not contain any e-mail addresses of a member of the public. Accordingly, none of the remaining information may be withheld under section 552.137. In summary, the city must withhold pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code: (1) the W-4 form we have marked in conjunction with title 26 of the United States Code (2) the marked I-9 forms conjunction with section 1324a of title 8 of the United States Code; (3) the marked CHRI in conjunction with section 411.083 of the Government Code; (4) the reports we have marked in conjunction with section 58.007(c) of the Family Code (5) the F-5 forms we marked in conjunction with section 1701.454 of the Occupations Code; and (6) the information we marked in conjunction with common-law privacy. The medical records we have marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. The city must withhold the information we marked under section 552.102(a) of the Government Code. To the extent the individual at issue is a licensed peace officer, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(2) of the Government Code. If the individual at issue is not a licensed peace officer, then to the extent the individual timely requested confidentiality under section 552.024 of the Government Code, the city must withhold the marked information under section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. The city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.1175 to the extent these individuals are currently licensed peace officers who elect with the department to restrict public access to their personal information. The city must withhold the Texas motor vehicle record information we have marked under section 552.130 of the Government Code. (6) The city must release the remaining information to the requestor. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Tamara Wilcox Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division TW/dls Ref: ID# 417978 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. Section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a government body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. Open Records Decision No. 670 allows a governmental body to withhold home addresses and telephone numbers, personal cellular telephone numbers, personal pager numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of peace officers under section 552.117 of the Government Code without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision under section 552.301. ORD 670 at 6. 2. Although you raise section 552.108 of the Government Code, you make no arguments to support this exception. Therefore, we assume you have withdrawn your claim that this section applies to the submitted information. 3. Although you raise section 411.085 of the Government Code, that provision merely provides the penalties for the "Unauthorized Obtaining, Use, or Disclosure of Criminal History Record Information." Gov't Code § 411.085. Section 411.083 is applicable to the dissemination of CHRI. 4. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception like section 552.102 on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. 5. We note that regardless of the applicability of section 552.117, section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. 6. We note Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009) is a previous determination issued by this office authorizing all governmental bodies to withhold ten categories of information without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision, including a Form I-9 and attachments under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 1324a of title 8 of the United States Code; W-4 forms under section 552.101 in conjunction with section 6103(a) of title 26 of the United States Code; and Texas driver's license and license plate numbers and a copy of a Texas driver's license under section 552.130 of the Government Code.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |