Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

April 4, 2011

Mr. Gregory Alicie

Open Records Specialist

Baytown Police Department

3200 North Main Street

Baytown, Texas 77521

OR2011-04533

Dear Mr. Alicie:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 414247.

The Baytown Police Department (the "department") received a request for a specified police report. You claim some of the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.147 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Section 552.101 excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." This section encompasses the doctrine of constitutional privacy. Constitutional privacy consists of two interrelated types of privacy: (1) the right to make certain kinds of decisions independently and (2) an individual's interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters. Open Records Decision No. 455 at 4 (1987). The first type protects an individual's autonomy within "zones of privacy," which include matters related to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, and child rearing and education. Id. The second type of constitutional privacy requires a balancing between the individual's privacy interests and the public's need to know information of public concern. Id. The scope of information protected is narrower than that under the common-law doctrine of privacy; the information must concern the "most intimate aspects of human affairs." Id. at 5; Ramie v. City of Hedwig Village, Texas, 765 F.2d 490 (5th Cir. 1985).

This office has applied constitutional privacy to protect certain information related to incarcerated individuals. See Open Records Decision Nos. 430 (1985), 428 (1985), 185 (1978). This office has held those individuals who correspond with inmates possess a "first amendment right . . . to maintain communication with [the inmate] free of the threat of public exposure," and this right would be violated by the release of information that identifies those correspondents, because such a release would discourage correspondence. ORD 185 at 2; see State v. Ellefson, 224 S.E.2d 666 (S.C. 1976). The information at issue in Open Records Decision No. 185 was the identities of individuals who had corresponded with inmates. In that decision, our office found the public's right to obtain an inmate's correspondence list is not sufficient to overcome the first amendment right of the inmate's correspondents to maintain communication with him free of the threat of public exposure." ORD 185 at 2. Implicit in this holding is the fact that an individual's association with an inmate may be intimate or embarrassing. In Open Records Decision Nos. 428 and 430, our office determined inmate visitor and mail logs that identify inmates and those who choose to visit or correspond with inmates are protected by constitutional privacy because people who correspond with inmates have a First Amendment right to do so that would be threatened if their names were released. ORDs 430, 428. The rights of those individuals to anonymity was found to outweigh the public's interest in this information. ORD 185; see ORD 430 (list of inmate visitors protected by constitutional privacy of both inmate and visitors). Accordingly, the department must withhold the inmate visitor information you have marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with constitutional privacy.

You also indicate some of the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.147 of the Government Code. Section 552.147(a) provides "[t]he social security number of a living person is excepted from" required public disclosure under the Act. Thus, the department may withhold the social security numbers in the submitted information under section 552.147. (1)

To conclude, the department must withhold the information you have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with constitutional privacy. The department may withhold the submitted social security numbers under section 552.147 of the Government Code. The department must release the remaining information. (2)

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

James L. Coggeshall

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

JLC/tf

Ref: ID# 414247

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. Section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act.

2. We note the requestor has a right of access to information in the submitted documents that otherwise would be excepted from release under the Act. See Gov't Code § 552.023(a) ("a person or a person's authorized representative has a special right of access, beyond the right of the general public, to information held by a governmental body that relates to the person and that is protected from public disclosure by laws intended to protect that person's privacy interests."); Open Records Decision No. 481 at 4 (1987) (privacy theories not implicated when individual requests information concerning herself). Thus, the department must again seek a decision from this office if it receives a request for this information from a different requestor.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs