![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
March 31, 2011 Ms. Michelle T. Rangel Assistant County Attorney Fort Bend County 301 Jackson Street, Suite 728 Richmond, Texas 77469 OR2011-04440 Dear Ms. Rangel: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 413226. The Fort Bend County Attorney's Office (the "county") received a request for all documents submitted by Carter Goble Lee in response to Request for Proposals ("RFP") 09-093, Term Contract of Turn-Key Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement Services of County Jail, and any letter of intent, contract, or agreement between Fort Bend County and Carter Goble Lee regarding the RFP. Although you indicate the county takes no position with respect to the public availability of the submitted bid proposal, contract, and RFP documents, you state their release may implicate the proprietary interests of CGL Engineering, Inc. ("CGL"). Accordingly, you state, and provide documentation showing, the county notified CGL of the request and of its right to submit arguments to this office as to why the submitted information should not be released. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d); see also Open Records Decision No. 542 (1990) (determining statutory predecessor to section 552.305 permits governmental body to rely on interested third party to raise and explain the applicability of exception to disclose under Act in certain circumstances). We have reviewed the submitted information. An interested third party is allowed ten business days after the date of its receipt of the governmental body's notice under section 552.305(d) to submit its reasons, if any, as to why information relating to that party should be withheld from public disclosure. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d)(2)(B). As of the date of this letter, we have not received comments from CGL explaining why the submitted information should not be released. Therefore, we have no basis to conclude CGL has protected proprietary interests in this information. See id. § 552.110; Open Records Decision Nos. 661 at 5-6 (1999) (to prevent disclosure of commercial or financial information, party must show by specific factual evidence, not conclusory or generalized allegations, that release of requested information would cause that party substantial competitive harm), 552 at 5 (1990) (party must establish prima facie case that information is trade secret), 542 at 3. Consequently, the county may not withhold any of the submitted information on the basis of any proprietary interests CGL may have in the information. We note the submitted information contains insurance policy numbers. Section 552.136 of the Government Code provides: (a) In this section, "access device" means a card, plate, code, account number, personal identification number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier or means of account access that alone or in conjunction with another access device may be used to: (1) obtain money, goods, services, or another thing of value; or (2) initiate a transfer of funds other than a transfer originated solely by paper instrument. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number that is collected, assembled, or maintained by or for a governmental body is confidential. (1) Gov't Code § 552.136. We conclude the insurance policy numbers we have marked constitute access device numbers for purposes of section 552.136. Thus, the county must withhold the marked information under section 552.136 of the Government Code. (2) As no exceptions to disclosure have been raised, the county must release the remaining information. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Leah B. Wingerson Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division LBW/dls Ref: ID# 413226 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Mr. Joe E. Lee CGL Engineering, Inc. 95 East Lanier Avenue Fayetteville, Georgia 30214 (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987). 2. We note this office issued Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009), a previous determination to all governmental bodies authorizing them to withhold ten categories of information, including insurance policy numbers under section 552.136 of the Government Code, without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |