![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
February 23, 2011 Ms. J. Middlebrooks Assistant City Attorney Criminal Law and Police Section City of Dallas 1400 South Lamar Dallas, Texas 75215 OR2011-02708 Dear Ms. Middlebrooks: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 409756 (DPD PIR 2010-11178). The Dallas Police Department (the "department") received a request for all records created since September 30, 2010, pertaining to administrative investigation control number 2010-271 and a named officer. You claim portions of the requested information are excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.136 of the Government Code. (1) We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (2) Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information if it (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be established. Id. at 681-82. This office has found some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses are generally highly intimate or embarrassing. See Open Records Decision No. 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps). However, information pertaining to the work conduct and job performance of public employees is subject to a legitimate public interest and, therefore, generally not protected from disclosure under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 405 at 2-3 (1983) (public has interest in manner in which public employee performs job), 329 at 2 (1982) (information relating to complaints against public employees and discipline resulting therefrom is not protected under former section 552.101), 208 at 2 (1978) (information relating to complaint against public employee and disposition of the complaint is not protected under common-law right of privacy); see also Open Records Decision No. 423 at 2 (1984) (scope of public employee privacy is narrow). You claim the information related to the named officer's medical conditions and symptoms you have marked is protected by common-law privacy. Upon review, we agree a portion of this information, which we have marked, is highly intimate or embarrassing and of no legitimate public concern. Thus, the department must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. Although we agree the remaining information you seek to withhold is highly intimate or embarrassing, we find this information is of legitimate public concern because it pertains to the alleged misconduct by the named officer at issue in the requested investigation records. Consequently, the department may not withhold any of the remaining information you seek to withhold under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. As you have not claimed any other exceptions to disclosure for this information, it must be released. You assert some of the remaining information is excepted under section 552.136 of the Government Code, which provides "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of [the Act], a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number that is collected, assembled, or maintained by or for a governmental body is confidential." Gov't Code § 552.136(b); see id. § 552.136(a) (defining "access device"). You seek to withhold the employee identification number you have marked in the remaining information under section 552.136. You inform us an employee's identification number is used in conjunction with one additional digit in order to access the employee's credit union account. Thus, we find the department must withhold the employee identification number you have marked under section 552.136 of the Government Code. In summary, the department must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy and the marked employee identification number under section 552.136 of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Leah B. Wingerson Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division LBW/dls Ref: ID# 409756 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. Although you also raise section 552.130 of the Government Code, you have not submitted arguments explaining how this exception applies to the requested information. Therefore, we presume you have withdrawn your claim under this exception. See Gov't Code §§ 552.301, .302. 2. We assume the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and, therefore, does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |