![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
February 7, 2011 Ms. Judith N. Benton Assistant City Attorney City of Waco P.O. Box 2570 Waco, Texas 76702-2570 OR2011-01868 Dear Ms. Benton: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 408303 (City of Waco Reference Nos. LGL-10-1172 and 10-1659). The Waco Police Department (the "department") received a request for reports, photographs, and 9-1-1 calls involving two named individuals to include incidents occurring during January 2010, and July 2010. You state the department released some information to the requestor. We understand you will redact the highlighted social security number pursuant to section 552.147(b) of the Government Code. (1) You claim portions of the submitted information are excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Initially, we note some of the submitted information may have been the subject of a previous request for information, in response to which this office issued Open Records Letter No. 2010-13105 (2010). In that ruling, we concluded, except for basic information, the department may withhold the submitted information under section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code. We have no indication the law, facts, and circumstances on which Open Records Letter No. 2010-13105 was based have changed. Accordingly, with regard to the requested information that is identical to the information previously requested and ruled upon by this office in the prior ruling, we conclude the department may continue to rely on Open Records Letter No. 2010-13105 as a previous determination and withhold or release the previously ruled upon information in accordance with that ruling. See Open Records Decision No. 673 (2001) (so long as law, facts, circumstances on which prior ruling was based have not changed, first type of previous determination exists where requested information is precisely same information as was addressed in prior attorney general ruling, ruling is addressed to same governmental body, and ruling concludes that information is or is not excepted from disclosure). To the extent the submitted information is not encompassed by the previous ruling, we will address your arguments against its release. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. Section 552.101 encompasses information made confidential by other statutes. You contend the information you have highlighted in the submitted CAD records is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 in conjunction with section 772.318 of the Health and Safety Code. Chapter 772 of the Health and Safety Code relates to local emergency communications districts. Section 772.318 applies to an emergency 9-1-1 district established in accordance with chapter 772, and makes confidential the originating telephone numbers and addresses of 9-1-1 callers that are furnished by a service supplier. See Open Records Decision No. 649 (1996). We understand the City of Waco to be part of an emergency communication district that was established under section 772.318. (2) Thus, we find, to the extent the telephone numbers and addresses you have highlighted are the originating telephone numbers and addresses supplied by a 9-1-1 service supplier, this information must be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with section 772.318. However, to the extent the highlighted information was not supplied by a 9-1-1 service supplier, section 772.318 is not applicable to this information, and it must be released to the requestor. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be established. Id. at 681-82. A compilation of an individual's criminal history is highly embarrassing information, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person. Cf. U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 764 (1989) (when considering prong regarding individual's privacy interest, court recognized distinction between public records found in courthouse files and local police stations and compiled summary of information and noted that individual has significant privacy interest in compilation of one's criminal history). Moreover, we find a compilation of a private citizen's criminal history is generally not of legitimate concern to the public. Upon review, we find the information you have marked is not highly intimate or embarrassing information of no legitimate public interest. Thus, the department may not withhold the information you have marked under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). A governmental body that claims an exception to disclosure under section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why this exception is applicable to the information at issue. See id. §§ 552.108(a)(1), .301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). You state the information you have marked relates to pending criminal prosecutions. Based on these representations and our review of the information at issue, we conclude release of this information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime. See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 1975) (court delineates law enforcement interests that are present in active cases), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976). Thus, we agree the department may withhold the information you have marked under section 552.108(a)(1). In summary, with regard to the requested information that is identical to the information previously requested and ruled upon by this office in Open Records Letter No. 2010-13105, the department may continue to rely on Open Records Letter No. 2010-13105 as a previous determination and withhold or release the identical information in accordance with that ruling. To the extent the telephone numbers and addresses you have highlighted are the originating telephone numbers and addresses supplied by a 9-1-1 service supplier, the department must withhold the highlighted telephone numbers and addresses under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 772.318 of the Health and Safety Code. The department may withhold the information you have marked under section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Ana Carolina Vieira Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division ACV/eeg Ref: ID# 408303 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. Section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living
person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this
office under the Act.
2. Section 772.318 of the Health and Safety Code applies to an emergency communication district for
a county with a population of more than 20,000. POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |