![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
January 20, 2011 Mr. Charles H. Weir Assistant City Attorney City of San Antonio P.O. Box 839966 San Antonio, Texas 78283-3966 OR2011-00953 Dear Mr. Weir: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 407137 (COSA File No. 2010-6964). The City of San Antonio (the "city") received a request for information pertaining to a named individual. You claim the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Section 552.101 encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be satisfied. Id. at 681-82. A compilation of an individual's criminal history is highly embarrassing information, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person. Cf. U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 764 (1989) (finding significant privacy interest in compilation of individual's criminal history by recognizing distinction between public records found in courthouse files and local police stations and compiled summary of criminal history information). Furthermore, we find a compilation of a private citizen's criminal history is generally not of legitimate concern to the public. The requestor asks for all information held by the city concerning a named individual. Therefore, to the extent the city maintains law enforcement records depicting the named individual as a suspect, arrestee, or criminal defendant, the city must withhold such information under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. We note you have submitted documents that do not list the named individual as a suspect, arrestee, or criminal defendant; therefore, we will address your arguments to withhold this information. Section 552.101 also encompasses information protected by other statutes. Section 261.201(a) of the Family Code provides as follows: [T]he following information is confidential, is not subject to public release under Chapter 552, Government Code, and may be disclosed only for purposes consistent with this code and applicable federal or state law or under rules adopted by an investigating agency: (1) a report of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect made under this chapter and the identity of the person making the report; and (2) except as otherwise provided in this section, the files, reports, records, communications, audiotapes, videotapes, and working papers used or developed in an investigation under this chapter or in providing services as a result of an investigation. Fam. Code § 261.201(a). You assert incident report number 03-662717 was used or developed in an investigation under chapter 261. Upon review, we find the information is within the scope of section 261.201 of the Family Code. See id. § 261.001(1) (defining "abuse" for purposes of chapter 261.201 of Family Code). You do not indicate the city's police department, which conducted the investigation, has adopted a rule that governs the release of this type of information; therefore, we assume no such rule exists. Given that assumption, we conclude incident report number 03-662717 is confidential pursuant to section 261.201 of the Family Code. See Open Records Decision No. 440 at 2 (1986) (predecessor statute). Accordingly, the city must withhold incident report number 03-662717 from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code as information made confidential by law. You assert the remaining information is excepted under section 552.108 of the Government Code. Section 552.108(a)(1) excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" A governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See Gov't Code §§ 552.108(a)(1), 552.301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). You state "[t]he requested investigation file pertains to a case that is still open." However, the request for information you submitted to this office with your request for a ruling was not for a specified case, but rather for information pertaining to a named individual. We also note you have submitted a number of different offense reports as information responsive to the request. See Gov't Code § 552.301(e)(1)(A). You noted one of these cases as being "closed" and another as "has been prosecuted." Accordingly, after review of your arguments and the information at issue, we conclude you failed to establish section 552.108(a)(1) is applicable to any of the remaining offense reports, and the city may not withhold any of them on that ground. To conclude, the city must withhold any law enforcement records depicting the named individual as a suspect, arrestee, or criminal defendant under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. The city must also withhold incident report number 03-662717 under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code. The city must release the remaining information. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, James L. Coggeshall Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JLC/tf Ref: ID# 407137 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |