![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
November 16, 2010 Mr. Joe Torres, III Attorney at Law For City of Alice 216 North Texas Boulevard, Suite 2 Alice, Texas 78332 OR2010-17334 Dear Mr. Torres: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 400138. The City of Alice (the "city"), which you represent, received a request for all collective bargaining meeting minutes between the city's Bargaining Team, Police Officers' Association, and Firefighters Association. You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.107 and 552.111 of the Government Code. (1) We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.111 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "an interagency or intra-agency memorandum or letter that would not be available by law to a party in litigation with the agency." Gov't Code § 552.111. This exception encompasses the attorney work product privilege found in rule 192.5 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News, 22 S.W.3d 351, 360 (Tex. 2000); Open Records Decision No. 677 at 4-8 (2002). Rule 192.5 defines work product as (1) material prepared or mental impressions developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for a party or a party's representatives, including the party's attorneys, consultants, sureties, indemnitors, insurers, employees, or agents; or (2) a communication made in anticipation of litigation or for trial between a party and the party's representatives or among a party's representatives, including the party's attorneys, consultants, sureties, indemnitors, insurers, employees or agents. Tex. R. Civ. P. 192.5. In order for this office to conclude the information was made or developed in anticipation of litigation, we must be satisfied a) a reasonable person would have concluded from the totality of the circumstances surrounding the investigation that there was a substantial chance that litigation would ensue; and b) the party resisting discovery believed in good faith that there was a substantial chance that litigation would ensue and [created or obtained the information] for the purpose of preparing for such litigation. Nat'l Tank Co. v. Brotherton, 851 S.W.2d 193, 207 (Tex. 1993). A "substantial chance" of litigation does not mean a statistical probability, but rather "that litigation is more than merely an abstract possibility or unwarranted fear." Id. at 204; ORD 677 at 7. In the case of a communication, a governmental body must show the communication was between a party and the party's representatives. ORD 677 at 7-8. A governmental body seeking to withhold information under this exception bears the burden of demonstrating the information was created or developed for trial or in anticipation of litigation by or for a party or a party's representative. Tex. R. Civ. P. 192.5; ORD 677 at 6-8. You state the information at issue consists of material prepared by a city employee, at the request of the city attorney, in anticipation of litigation and during the ongoing course of negotiations conducted pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between the city and its unionized police and fire departments under section 174 of the Local Government Code. See Local Gov't Code § 174.001 et. seq. You further state the requested information consists of mental impressions and materials prepared in anticipation of arbitration and eventual trial pursuant to section 174 of the Local Government Code. Based on your representations and our review, we find the city may withhold the submitted information under section 552.111 of the Government Code. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining arguments against disclosure. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Vanessa Burgess Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division VB/dls Ref: ID# 400138 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. Although you raise section 552.111K(2) of the Government Code, we note this section does not exist in the Act. Thus, we understand you to raise section 552.111 of the Government Code.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |