Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

June 30, 2010

Ms. Teresa J. Brown

Senior Open Records Assistant

Plano Police Department

P.O. Box 860358

Plano, Texas 75086-0358

OR2010-09673

Dear Ms. Brown:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 385308.

The Plano Police Department (the "department") received a request for a named officer's entire personnel file. You claim the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information, a portion of which is a representative sample. (1) We have also received and considered comments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (interested party may submit written comments regarding availability of requested information).

Initially, the requestor states he is defense counsel in a case to which the requested information relates because the named officer was the arresting officer in the case. As such, the requestor argues the department has an obligation to disclose the requested information to him pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and, thus, the department may not withhold the requested information under section 552.101 or section 552.108 of the Government Code. In Brady, the Supreme Court held the prosecution is required to provide the defense with all potentially exculpatory evidence. 373 U.S. at 87. We note Brady addresses prosecutorial requirements and does not affect the requirements outlined in the Act. Here, the department is not the prosecution in the case at issue. Furthermore, the requestor submitted his request for information to the department pursuant to the Act. Accordingly, we will address the applicability of the Act to the requested information.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This exception encompasses information other statutes make confidential. You raise section 552.101 in conjunction with section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. You state the City of Plano is a civil service city under chapter 143 of the Local Government Code. Section 143.089 provides for the existence of two different types of personnel files relating to a police officer: one that must be maintained as part of the officer's civil service file and another the police department may maintain for its own internal use. See Local Gov't Code § 143.089(a), (g). The officer's civil service file must contain certain specified items, including commendations, periodic evaluations by the police officer's supervisor, and documents relating to any misconduct in which the department took disciplinary action against the officer under chapter 143 of the Local Government Code. Id. § 143.089(a)(1)-(2). Chapter 143 prescribes the following types of disciplinary actions: removal, suspension, demotion, and uncompensated duty. Id. §§ 143.051-.055. In cases in which a police department investigates a police officer's misconduct and takes disciplinary action against an officer, it is required by section 143.089(a)(2) to place all investigatory records relating to the investigation and disciplinary action, including background documents such as complaints, witness statements, and documents of like nature from individuals who were not in a supervisory capacity, in the police officer's civil service file maintained under section 143.089(a). See Abbott v. Corpus Christi, 109 S.W.3d 113, 122 (Tex. App.--Austin 2003, no pet.). All investigatory materials in a case resulting in disciplinary action are "from the employing department" when they are held by or are in the possession of the department because of its investigation into a police officer's misconduct, and the department must forward them to the civil service commission for placement in the civil service personnel file. Id. Such records may not be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. See Local Gov't Code § 143.089(f); Open Records Decision No. 562 at 6 (1990). However, information maintained in a police department's internal file pursuant to section 143.089(g) is confidential and must not be released. City of San Antonio v. Tex. Attorney Gen., 851 S.W.2d 946, 949 (Tex. App.--Austin 1993, writ denied).

The submitted personnel records contain, among other things, information pertaining to the named officer's misconduct for which no disciplinary action was taken. In communications with this office, you state the submitted personnel records are maintained in the department's internal files as authorized under section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code. Based on this representation and our review, we agree the submitted information is confidential pursuant to section 143.089(g). (2) Accordingly, the department must withhold the submitted personnel records under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code. (3)

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

Leah B. Wingerson

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

LBW/dls

Ref: ID# 385308

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. We assume the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and, therefore, does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.

2. We note section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code requires a police department that receives a request for information maintained in a file under section 143.089(g) to refer that person to the civil service director or the director's designee.

3. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining argument against disclosure.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs