![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
June 18, 2010 Mr. Warren M. S. Ernst Chief of the General Counsel Division City of Dallas 1500 Marilla Street, Room 7BN Dallas, Texas 75201 OR2010-08964 Dear Mr. Ernst: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 383288. The City of Dallas (the "city") received a request for a specified internal affairs investigation for a named individual, as well as all internal affairs investigations of a specified type for the past four years. You state some information pertaining to the specified investigation will be released to the requestor. You also state the city has no information responsive to the part of the request related to the specified type of investigation. (1) You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (2) Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information that other statutes make confidential, such as section 411.083 of the Government Code. Criminal history record information ("CHRI") generated by the National Crime Information Center or by the Texas Crime Information Center is confidential. See id. § 411.083(a); Open Records Decision No. 565 (1990). Title 28, part 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations governs the release of CHRI that states obtain from the federal government or other states. See ORD 565. The federal regulations allow each state to follow its individual law with respect to CHRI it generates. Id. Section 411.083 deems confidential CHRI that the Department of Public Safety ("DPS") maintains, except that DPS may disseminate this information as provided in chapter 411, subchapter F of the Government Code. See Gov't Code § 411.083. Sections 411.083(b)(1) and 411.089(a) authorize a criminal justice agency to obtain CHRI; however, a criminal justice agency may not release CHRI except to another criminal justice agency for a criminal justice purpose. Id. § 411.089(b)(1). Other entities specified in chapter 411 of the Government Code are entitled to obtain CHRI from DPS or another criminal justice agency; however, those entities may not release CHRI except as provided by chapter 411. See generally id. §§ 411.090-.127. Furthermore, any CHRI obtained from DPS or any other criminal justice agency must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with Government Code chapter 411, subchapter F. The term CHRI does not include driving record information maintained by DPS. Id. § 411.082(2)(B). Upon review, we find you have failed to establish how any portion of the information you have marked constitutes CHRI for purposes of chapter 411. Thus, none of this information may be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code on that basis. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. See Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). This office has found that some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses is excepted from required public disclosure under common-law privacy. See Open Records Decision Nos. 470 (1987) (illness from severe emotional and job-related stress), 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps). Upon review, we find that portions of the submitted information, which we have marked, are highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate public interest. Thus, the city must withhold this information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. You also seek to withhold under common-law privacy portions of the remaining information, some of which pertains to the named individual's criminal history. This office has held that a compilation of an individual's criminal history is highly embarrassing information, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person. Cf. U. S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 764 (1989) (finding significant privacy interest in compilation of individual's criminal history by recognizing distinction between public records found in courthouse files and local police stations and compiled summary of criminal history information). Furthermore, a compilation of a private citizen's criminal history is generally not of legitimate concern to the public. We note, however, that records relating to routine traffic violations are not considered criminal history record information. Cf. Gov't Code § 411.082(2)(B) (criminal history record information does not include driving record information). This office has also found the public has a legitimate interest in information relating to employees of governmental bodies and their employment qualifications and job performance. See Open Records Decision Nos. 562 at 10 (1990), 542 at 5 (1990); see also Open Records Decision No. 423 at 2 (1984) (scope of public employee privacy is narrow). In this instance, some of the information you seek to withhold pertains to a firefighter, not a private citizen. Because the firefighter's compiled criminal history information was gathered as part of the internal affairs investigation at issue, and therefore relates to the firefighter's employment qualifications, there is a legitimate public interest in this information. Accordingly, the doctrine of common-law privacy is not applicable to this information, and the remaining information at issue may not be withheld on this basis. Further, we find you have failed to demonstrate how any portion of the remaining information at issue is highly intimate or embarrassing and not of legitimate public interest. Accordingly, the remaining information you have marked may not be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. We note a portion of the remaining information in Exhibits B and C may be subject to section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. (3) Section 552.117(a)(1) excepts from disclosure the home address and telephone number, social security number, and family member information of a current or former official or employee of a governmental body who requests that the information be kept confidential under section 552.024 of the Government Code. Id. § 552.117(a)(1). Whether a particular item of information is protected by section 552.117(a)(1) must be determined at the time of the governmental body's receipt of the request for the information. See Open Records Decision No. 530 at 5 (1989). Thus, information may be withheld under section 552.117(a)(1) only on behalf of a current or former official or employee who made a request for confidentiality under section 552.024 prior to the date of the governmental body's receipt of the request for the information. Therefore, to the extent the employee concerned timely requested confidentiality under section 552.024, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(1). We note some of the remaining information is subject to section 552.130 of the Government Code. Section 552.130 excepts from disclosure information relating to a motor vehicle title or registration issued by an agency of this state. Gov't Code § 552.130. Thus, the city must withhold the Texas license plate number we have marked under section 552.130 of the Government Code. (4) In summary, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy. To the extent the employee concerned timely elected under section 552.024 to keep their information confidential, the city must withhold the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(1). The city must also withhold the information we have marked under section 552.130 of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Jennifer Burnett Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JB/dls Ref: ID# 383288 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. We note that the Act does not require a governmental body to disclose information that did not exist at the time the request was received. Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd); Open Records Decision No. 452 at 3 (1986). 2. We assume that the "representative sample" of information submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office. 3. The Office of the Attorney General will raise mandatory exceptions on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. See Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987). 4. We note this office recently issued Open Records Decision No. 684 (2009), a previous determination to all governmental bodies authorizing them to withhold ten categories of information, including Texas license plate numbers under section 552.130 of the Government Code, without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |