Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

May 24, 2010

Mr. Charles H. Weir

Assistant City Attorney

City of San Antonio

P.O. Box 839966

San Antonio, Texas 78283-3966

OR2010-07496

Dear Mr. Weir:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 380187 (ORR 10-0303).

The City of San Antonio (the "city") received a request for the arrest record of and any complaints against a named police officer. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. Section 552.101 of the Government Code also encompasses the doctrine of common-law privacy, which protects information that (1) contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person and (2) is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). To demonstrate the applicability of common-law privacy, both prongs of this test must be demonstrated. Id. at 681-82. A compilation of an individual's criminal history record information is highly embarrassing information, the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person. Cf. U.S. Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 764 (1989) (finding significant privacy interest in compilation of individual's criminal history by recognizing distinction between public records found in courthouse files and local police stations and compiled summary of criminal history information). Furthermore, we find that a compilation of a private citizen's criminal history is generally not of legitimate concern to the public. However, the information at issue does not pertain to a private citizen but to a peace officer. There is a legitimate public interest in the compilation of criminal history of a peace officer, and therefore, such information is not private. Accordingly, the named officer's arrest record may not be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy.

Section 552.101 also encompasses information protected by other statutes, such as section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. You indicate that the city is a civil service city under chapter 143 of the Local Government Code. Section 143.089 provides for the existence of two different types of personnel files relating to a police officer: one that must be maintained as part of the officer's civil service file and another the police department may maintain for its own internal use. See Local Gov't Code § 143.089(a), (g). The officer's civil service file must contain certain specified items, including commendations, periodic evaluations by the police officer's supervisor, and documents relating to any misconduct in which the department took disciplinary action against the officer under chapter 143 of the Local Government Code. Id. § 143.089(a)(1)-(2). Chapter 143 prescribes the following types of disciplinary actions: removal, suspension, demotion, and uncompensated duty. Id. §§ 143.051-.055; see Attorney General Opinion JC-0257 (written reprimand is not disciplinary action for purposes of Local Gov't Code chapter 143). In cases in which a police department investigates a police officer's misconduct and takes disciplinary action against an officer, it is required by section 143.089(a)(2) to place all investigatory records relating to the investigation and disciplinary action, including background documents such as complaints, witness statements, and documents of like nature from individuals who were not in a supervisory capacity, in the police officer's civil service file maintained under section 143.089(a). See Abbott v. Corpus Christi, 109 S.W.3d 113, 122 (Tex. App.-- Austin 2003, no pet.). All investigatory materials in a case resulting in disciplinary action are "from the employing department" when they are held by or are in the possession of the department because of its investigation into a police officer's misconduct, and the department must forward them to the civil service commission for placement in the civil service personnel file. Id. Such records may not be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. See Local Gov't Code § 143.089(f); Open Records Decision No. 562 at 6 (1990). However, information maintained in a police department's internal file pursuant to section 143.089(g) is confidential and must not be released. City of San Antonio v. Tex. Attorney Gen., 851 S.W.2d 946, 949 (Tex. App.--Austin 1993, writ denied).

In this instance, you state that the request has been forwarded to the San Antonio Fire Fighter and Police Officers Civil Service Commission. (1) You explain the submitted complaint information is contained in the police department's internal file for the named officer and that this information is maintained under section 143.089(g). Based on your representations and our review, we agree that the submitted complaint information is confidential under section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code and must generally be withheld from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code.

However, we note that the information at issue includes the requestor's medical records. Medical records are governed by the Medical Practice Act (the "MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides in part:

(a) A communication between a physician and a patient, relative to or in connection with any professional services as a physician to the patient, is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained.

Occ. Code § 159.002(a)-(c). Medical records must be released on the patient's signed, written consent, provided that the consent specifies (1) the information to be covered by the release, (2) reasons or purposes for the release, and (3) the person to whom the information is to be released. See id. §§ 159.004, .005. As the subject of the submitted medical records, the requestor may obtain his records upon compliance with the MPA's release provisions. See id. §§ 159.004, .005. In this instance, however, the city seeks to withhold the medical records under section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. Thus, we must address the conflict between the requestor's right of access under the MPA and the confidentiality provided these records under section 143.089 of the Local Government Code. Where information falls within both a general and a specific statutory provision, the specific provision prevails over the general statute, unless the general provision was enacted later and there is clear evidence that the legislature intended the general provision to prevail. See Gov't Code § 311.026 (where general statutory provision conflicts with specific provision, specific provision prevails as exception to general provision); Cuellar v. State, 521 S.W.2d 277 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975) (under well-established rule of statutory construction, specific statutory provisions prevail over general ones). The MPA is a more specific statute than section 143.089 because the MPA applies specifically to medical records while section 143.089 applies generally to all records in a personnel file. Additionally, section 143.089 of the Local Government Code was enacted prior to the MPA's release provision in section 159.004 of the Occupations Code. See Occ. Code § 159.004, added by Act of May 17, 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 388, § 1 (effective Sept. 1, 1999), amended by Act of May 25, 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 984, § 3 (effective June 15, 2001); Loc. Gov't Code § 143.089, added by Act of March 1, 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1, § 25(c) (effective Aug. 28, 1989), amended by Act of May 29, 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1248, § 84 (effective Sept. 1, 1989). Therefore, the medical records we marked in the submitted information are subject to the MPA and may only be released to in accordance with its provisions. See ORD 598.

In summary, the medical records we marked may only be released in accordance with the MPA. The city must withhold the rest of the submitted complaint information under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.089(g) of the Local Government Code. The named officer's arrest record must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787.

Sincerely,

Paige Lay

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

PL/eeg

Ref: ID# 380187

Enc. Submitted documents

cc: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. Section 143.089(g) requires a police or fire department that receives a request for information maintained in a file under section 143.089(g) to refer that person to the civil service director or the director's designee.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs