![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
January 27, 2010 Ms. Angela M. DeLuca Assistant City Attorney City of Bryan P.O. Box 1000 Bryan, Texas 77805 OR2010-01272 Dear Ms. DeLuca: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 368351. The City of Bryan (the "city") received a request for the Southwest General Services of Dallas, LLC ("SGS") proposal for request for proposals 09-148. Although the city takes no position with respect to the public availability of the submitted proposal, you state its release may implicate the proprietary interests of third party SGS. Accordingly, you state the city has notified SGS of the city's receipt of the request for information and of SGS's right to submit arguments to this office as to why its information should not be released to the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d); see also Open Records Decision No. 542 (1990) (statutory predecessor to section 552.305 permits governmental body to rely on interested third party to raise and explain applicability of exception in the Act in certain circumstances). We have reviewed the submitted information. An interested third party is allowed ten business days after the date of its receipt of the governmental body's notice under section 552.305(d) to submit its reasons, if any, as to why information relating to that party should be withheld from public disclosure. See Gov't Code § 552.305(d)(2)(B). As of the date of this letter, we have not received comments from SGS explaining why its proposal should not be released. Therefore, we have no basis to conclude SGS has a protected proprietary interest in its proposal. See id. § 552.110; Open Records Decision Nos. 661 at 5-6 (1999) (to prevent disclosure of commercial or financial information, party must show by specific factual evidence, not conclusory or generalized allegations, that release of requested information would cause that party substantial competitive harm), 552 at 5 (1990) (party must establish prima facie case that information is trade secret), 542 at 3. Accordingly, the city may not withhold SGS's proposal on the basis of any proprietary interest SGS may have in it. As you raise no exceptions to disclosure, the submitted proposal must be released in its entirety to the requestor. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Jessica Eales Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JCE/eeg Ref: ID# 368351 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |