![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
January 26, 2010 Ms. Helen Valkavich Assistant City Attorney City of San Antonio P.O. Box 839966 San Antonio, Texas 78283-3966 OR2010-01197 Dear Ms. Valkavich: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 368366 (COSA File Nos. 09-1409 and 10-0009). The City of San Antonio (the "city") received two requests for information related to (1) the termination or resignation of a named individual, (2) a specified retirement party, and (3) the sworn testimony of a named individual. You state that the city has no information responsive to the request regarding sworn testimony. (1) You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.108 of the Government Code. (2) We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information. We begin by noting that some of the submitted documents are not responsive to the instant request for information, as they were created after the date that the city received the request. This ruling does not address the public availability of any information that is not responsive to the request, and the city need not release that information in response to this request. See Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd); Open Records Decision No. 452 at 3 (1986) (governmental body not required to disclose information that did not exist at time request was received). Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime [if] release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime." Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). A governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See id. §§ 552.108(a)(1), 552.301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). By its terms, section 552.108 applies only to a law enforcement agency or a prosecutor. You indicate that the submitted information consists of an investigation conducted by the city's Office of Municipal Integrity ("OMI"). You have not demonstrated that the OMI is a law enforcement agency. See Open Records Decision No. 199 (1978) (agency whose function is essentially regulatory in nature is not "law enforcement agency" for purposes of statutory predecessor to section 552.108). Section 552.108, however, may be invoked by the proper custodian of information relating to an investigation or prosecution of criminal conduct. See Open Records Decision No. 474 at 4-5 (1987). Where a governmental body possesses information relating to a pending case of a law enforcement agency, the governmental body may withhold the information under section 552.108 if (1) it demonstrates that the information relates to the pending case and (2) this office is provided with a representation from the law enforcement entity that the law enforcement entity wishes to withhold the information. In this instance, you have provided our office with a representation from the Bexar County Criminal District Attorney's Office (the "district attorney"), which states that the district attorney objects to disclosure of the submitted information because its release would interfere with a pending criminal case. Based on this representation, we conclude that the city may withhold the submitted information under section 552.108(a)(1) of the Government Code. See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976) (court delineates law enforcement interests that are present in active cases). This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General, toll free, at (888) 672-6787. Sincerely, Cindy Nettles Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division CN/dls Ref: ID# 368366 Enc. Submitted documents c: Requestors (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. The Act does not require a governmental body to release information that did not exist when a request for information was received or to prepare new information in response to a request. See Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266, 267-68 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd); Open Records Decision Nos. 605 at 2 (1992), 452 at 3 (1986), 362 at 2 (1983). 2. Although you also raised sections 552.101 and 552.107 of the Government Code in regard to the second request, you have not submitted arguments explaining how these exceptions apply to the submitted information. Therefore, we presume that you have withdrawn these exceptions. See Gov't Code §§ 552.301, 552.302.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |