Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

March 26, 2009

Mr. Steven M. Peña, Sr.

Law Offices of Davidson & Troilo

7550 West IH-10, Suite 800

San Antonio, Texas 78229-5815

OR2009-03964

Dear Mr. Peña:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 338203.

The City of Helotes (the "city"), which you represent, received a request for attorney fee bills over a specified time period. You state that the city has released portions of the requested information to the requestor. You claim that the remaining information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.107 of the Government Code, and privileged under Texas Rule of Evidence 503. We have considered your arguments and reviewed the submitted information.

We note that the submitted information consists of attorney fee bills that are subject to section 552.022 of the Government Code. Section 552.022(a)(16) provides for the required public disclosure of "information that is in a bill for attorney's fees and that is not privileged under the attorney-client privilege," unless the information is expressly confidential under other law. Gov't Code § 552.022(a)(16). Although you seek to withhold information contained in the attorney fee bills under section 552.107 of the Government Code, this section is a discretionary exception to disclosure that protects a governmental body's interests and may be waived. See id. § 552.007; Open Records Decision Nos. 676 at 10-11 (2002) (attorney-client privilege under section 552.107(1) may be waived), 665 (2002) (discretionary exceptions generally). As such, section 552.107(1) is not other law that makes information confidential for the purposes of section 552.022(a)(16). Therefore, the city may not withhold any of the information at issue under section 552.107 of the Government Code. The Texas Supreme Court has held, however, that the Texas Rules of Evidence are "other law" within the meaning of section 552.022. See In re City of Georgetown, 53 S.W.3d 328, 336 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, we will consider your assertion of the attorney-client privilege under Texas Rules of Evidence 503.

Texas Rule of Evidence 503 enacts the attorney-client privilege. Rule 503(b)(1) provides as follows:

A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client:

(A) between the client or a representative of the client and the client's lawyer or a representative of the lawyer;

(B) between the lawyer and the lawyer's representative;

(C) by the client or a representative of the client, or the client's lawyer or a representative of the lawyer, to a lawyer or a representative of a lawyer representing another party in a pending action and concerning a matter of common interest therein;

(D) between representatives of the client or between the client and a representative of the client; or

(E) among lawyers and their representatives representing the same client.

Tex. R. Evid. 503(b)(1). A communication is "confidential" if not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is made in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication. Id. 503(a)(5).

Thus, in order to withhold attorney-client privileged information from disclosure under rule 503, a governmental body must: (1) show that the document is a communication transmitted between privileged parties or reveals a confidential communication; (2) identify the parties involved in the communication; and (3) show that the communication is confidential by explaining that it was not intended to be disclosed to third persons and that it was made in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client. Upon a demonstration of all three factors, the information is privileged and confidential under rule 503, provided the client has not waived the privilege or the document does not fall within the purview of the exceptions to the privilege enumerated in rule 503(d). Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Caldwell, 861 S.W.2d 423, 427 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, no writ).

You state that the submitted attorney fee bills document communications between the city's attorneys and municipal officers, city representatives, or other attorneys in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the city. You also state that the communications were intended to be and have remained confidential. Thus, you contend that the information you have marked in the responsive fee bills is privileged under rule 503. However, some of the entries you have marked in the fee bills do not document communications. Additionally, you have failed to specifically identify some of the parties to the communications. Therefore, the city has failed to demonstrate that portions of the marked entries document privileged attorney-client communications. However, we have marked some entries in the fee bills that are protected by the attorney-client privilege and may therefore be withheld under Texas Rule of Evidence 503. The remaining information must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

Sincerely,

Karen E. Stack

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

KES/sdk

Ref: ID# 338203

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs