Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

March 26, 2009

Mr. Mark G. Mann

Assistant City Attorney

City of Garland

P.O. Box 469002

garland, Texas 75046-9002

OR2009-03940

Dear Mr. Mann:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 338086 (GCA09-0023).

The Garland Police Department (the "department") received three requests from the same requestor for 9-1-1 calls, surveillance video, and police radio transmissions pertaining to a specified incident. You state the requested surveillance video does not exist. (1) You claim the remaining requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

We first address your argument under section 552.108 of the Government Code, as this is the most encompassing exception you raise. Section 552.108(a)(1) excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). Generally, a governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See id. §§ 552.108(a)(1), (b)(1), .301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). Although you generally state that the submitted 9-1-1 call recording and police radio transmissions relate to an ongoing criminal investigation, you do not explain how this information, relating to a completed suicide, pertains to an ongoing criminal investigation or prosecution. Further, you do not provide any arguments explaining how release of this information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime. Therefore, you have failed to demonstrate the applicability of section 552.108(a)(1) to the submitted information, and it may not be withheld on that basis.

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information protected by other statutes. You claim the submitted 9-1-1 call recording is confidential under section 552.101 in conjunction with the Medical Practice Act ("MPA"), subtitle B of title 3 of the Occupations Code. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides in pertinent part:

(a) A communication between a physician and a patient, relative to or in connection with any professional services as a physician to the patient, is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained.

Occ. Code § 159.002(a)-(c). This office has concluded that the protection afforded by section 159.002 extends only to records created by either a physician or someone under the supervision of a physician. See Open Records Decision Nos. 487 (1987), 370 (1983), 343 (1982). Further, information that is subject to the MPA also includes information that was obtained from medical records. See Occ. Code. § 159.002(a), (b), (c); see also Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991).

Medical records must be released upon the patient's signed, written consent, provided that the consent specifies (1) the information to be covered by the release, (2) reasons or purposes for the release, and (3) the person to whom the information is to be released. Occ. Code §§ 159.004, .005. Medical records pertaining to a deceased patient may only be released upon the signed consent of the deceased's personal representative. See id. § 159.005(a)(5). Any subsequent release of medical records must be consistent with the purposes for which the governmental body obtained the records. See id. § 159.002(c); Open Records Decision No. 565 at 7 (1990). Upon review, we agree a portion of the submitted 9-1-1 call recording, which we have identified, consists of information obtained from a medical record that is subject to the MPA. The department may only disclose this information in accordance with the MPA. However, no portion of the remaining 9-1-1 call recording constitutes a medical record or information obtained from a medical record for the purposes of the MPA. Accordingly, none of the remaining information may be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with the MPA.

Next, we note the submitted police radio transmissions contain a Texas license plate number that is subject to section 552.130 of the Government Code. (2) Section 552.130 excepts from disclosure "information [that] relates to . . . a motor vehicle operator's or driver's license or permit issued by an agency of this state [or] a motor vehicle title or registration issued by an agency of this state[.]" Gov't Code § 552.130. We note that the purpose of section 552.130 is to protect the privacy interests of individuals. Since the right of privacy lapses at death, Texas motor vehicle record information that pertains to a deceased individual may not be withheld under section 552.130. See Moore v. Charles B. Pierce Film Enterprises, Inc., 589 S.W.2d 489, 491 (Tex. Civ. App.--Texarkana 1979, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (Texas does not recognize relational or derivative right of privacy); see also Attorney General Opinions JM-229 (1984); H-917 (1976); Open Records Decision No. 272 at 1 (1981). Thus, to the extent a living person has an ownership interest in the vehicle to which the license plate number in the submitted police radio transmissions belongs, the license plate number must be withheld under to section 552.130 of the Government Code. If no living person owns an interest in the vehicle at issue, the license plate number must be released.

In summary, the information obtained from a medical record, which we have identified in the submitted 9-1-1 call recording, may only be released in accordance with the MPA. To the extent a living person has an ownership interest in the vehicle to which the license plate in the submitted police radio transmissions belongs, the license plate number must be withheld under section 552.130 of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released to the requestor.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

Sincerely,

Amy L.S. Shipp

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

ALS/cc

Ref: ID# 338086

Enc. Submitted documents

cc: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. The Act does not require a governmental body that receives a request for information to create information that did not exist when the request was received. See Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd); Open Records Decision Nos. 605 at 2 (1992), 563 at 8 (1990), 555 at 1-2 (1990).

2. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987).

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs