Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

March 26, 2009

Ms. Ylise Janssen

Senior School Law Attorney

Austin Independent School District

1111 West Sixth Street

Austin, Texas 78703

OR2009-03906

Dear Ms. Janssen:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 338273.

The Austin Independent School District (the "district") received a request for five categories of information related to communications and complaints against a named teacher. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.107 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. We have also considered the arguments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (interested party may submit comments stating why information should or should not be released).

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from public disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. Section 552.101 encompasses information protected by other statutes. Section 261.201(a) of the Family Code provides as follows:

(a) The following information is confidential, is not subject to public release under Chapter 552, Government Code, and may be disclosed only for purposes consistent with this code and applicable federal or state law or under rules adopted by an investigating agency:

(1) a report of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect made under this chapter and the identity of the person making the report; and

(2) except as otherwise provided in this section, the files, reports, records, communications, and working papers used or developed in an investigation under this chapter or in providing services as a result of an investigation.

Fam. Code § 261.201(a). We note that the district is not an agency authorized to conduct a chapter 261 investigation. See id. § 261.103 (listing agencies that may conduct child abuse investigations). However, you represent the report labeled Exhibit D pertains to an investigation of alleged or suspected child abuse by the district's police department. See id. § 261.001(1) (defining "abuse" for the purposes of chapter 261 of the Family Code). Because the report at issue was used or developed in an investigation of alleged or suspected child abuse, the report is within the scope of section 261.201 of the Family Code. You have not indicated that the district's police department has adopted a rule that governs the release of this type of information. Therefore, we assume that no such regulation exists. Given that assumption, the report labeled Exhibit D is confidential pursuant to section 261.201 of the Family Code. See Open Records Decision No. 440 at 2 (1986) (predecessor statute). Accordingly, the district must withhold Exhibit D in its entirety under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code.

Section 552.107(1) of the Government Code protects information that comes within the attorney-client privilege. When asserting the attorney-client privilege, a governmental body has the burden of providing the necessary facts to demonstrate the elements of the privilege in order to withhold the information at issue. Open Records Decision No. 676 at 6-7 (2002).

First, a governmental body must demonstrate that the information constitutes or documents a communication. Id. at 7. Second, the communication must have been made "for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services" to the client governmental body. Tex. R. Evid. 503(b)(1). The privilege does not apply when an attorney or representative is involved in some capacity other than that of providing or facilitating professional legal services to the client governmental body. In re Texas Farmers Ins. Exch., 990 S.W.2d 337, 340 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1999, orig. proceeding) (attorney-client privilege does not apply if attorney acting in a capacity other than that of attorney). Third, the privilege applies only to communications between or among clients, client representatives, lawyers, and lawyer representatives. See Tex. R. Evid. 503(b)(1). Thus, a governmental body must inform this office of the identities and capacities of the individuals to whom each communication at issue has been made. Lastly, the attorney-client privilege applies only to a confidential communication, meaning it was "not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is made in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication." Id. 503(a)(5). Whether a communication meets this definition depends on the intent of the parties involved at the time the information was communicated. Osborne v. Johnson, 954 S.W.2d 180, 184 (Tex. App.--Waco 1997, no writ). Moreover, because the client may elect to waive the privilege at any time, a governmental body must explain that the confidentiality of a communication has been maintained. We note that section 552.107(1) generally excepts an entire communication that is demonstrated to be protected by the attorney-client privilege unless otherwise waived by the governmental body. See Huie v. DeShazo, 922 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. 1996) (privilege extends to entire communication, including facts contained therein).

You claim that portions of the submitted information labeled in Exhibit E consist of a confidential communication between district employees and an attorney representing the district. You also state the communications were made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the district, and the confidentiality of the communication has been maintained. Based on your representations and our review of the information at issue, we agree that the information you have marked in Exhibit E constitutes privileged attorney-client communications. Accordingly, the district may withhold this information under section 552.107 of the Government Code.

In summary, the district must withhold the report you have marked as Exhibit D under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code. The district may withhold the information you have marked in Exhibit E under section 552.107 of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released to the requestor.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

Sincerely,

Tamara Wilcox

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

TW/eeg

Ref: ID# 338273

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Requestor

(w/o enclosures)

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs