![]() ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
January 16, 2009 Mr. James Mu Assistant General Counsel Office of General Counsel Texas Department of Criminal Justice P.O. Box 4004 Huntsville, Texas 77342-4004 OR2009-00696 Dear Mr. Mu: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 332710. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (the "department") received a request for EEO investigative report number 03003141. You claim the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from public disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses the common-law right of privacy, which protects information that is 1) highly intimate or embarrassing, such that its release would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and 2) not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668 (Tex. 1976). In Morales v. Ellen, 840 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1992, writ denied), the court addressed the applicability of the common-law privacy doctrine to files of an investigation of allegations of sexual harassment. The investigation files in Ellen contained individual witness statements, an affidavit by the individual accused of the misconduct responding to the allegations, and conclusions of the board of inquiry that conducted the investigation. Id. at 525. The court ordered the release of the affidavit of the person under investigation and the conclusions of the board of inquiry, stating that the public's interest was sufficiently served by the disclosure of such documents. Id. In concluding, the Ellen court held that "the public did not possess a legitimate interest in the identities of the individual witnesses, nor the details of their personal statements beyond what is contained in the documents that have been ordered released." Id. Thus, if there is an adequate summary of an investigation of alleged sexual harassment, the investigation summary must be released under Ellen, but the identities of the victims and witnesses of the alleged sexual harassment must be redacted, and their detailed statements must be withheld from disclosure. See Open Records Decision Nos. 393 (1983), 339 (1982). We also note that supervisors are generally not witnesses for purposes of Ellen, except where their statements appear in a non-supervisory context. The submitted information relates to an investigation into an alleged sexual harassment. Upon review, we determine the submitted information consists of an adequate summary of the alleged sexual harassment. This summary is not confidential; however, information within the summary identifying the alleged victim and witnesses is confidential. Therefore, the department must withhold the identifying information we have marked pursuant to section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy and the holding in Ellen. See Ellen, 840 S.W.2d at 525. We note that portions of the remaining information are subject to section 552.117 of the Government Code. (1) Section 552.117(a)(3) excepts from public disclosure the present and former home addresses and telephone numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of current or former employees of the department or the predecessor in function of the department or any division of the department, regardless of whether the current or former employee complies with section 552.1175. Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(3). In Open Records Letter No. 2005-01067 (2005), we issued a previous determination that authorizes the department to withhold information under section 552.117(a)(3) without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. See id. 552.301(a); Open Records Decision No. 673 at 7-8 (2001). Thus, the department must withhold the information we have marked pursuant to section 552.117(a)(3). In summary, the department must withhold the information we have marked pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy and the holding in Ellen, and the information we have marked under section 552.117(a)(3) of the Government Code. The remaining information must be released. This letter ruling is limited to the particular information at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other information or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For more information concerning those rights and responsibilities, please visit our website at http://www.oag.state.tx.us/open/index_orl.php, or call the Office of the Attorney General's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. Questions concerning the allowable charges for providing public information under the Act must be directed to the Cost Rules Administrator of the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497. Sincerely, Jordan Hale Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division JH/jb Ref: ID# 332710 Enc. Submitted documents cc: Requestor (w/o enclosures)
1. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception on behalf of a governmental
body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470
(1987). POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |