Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

April 1, 2008

Ms. Carol Longoria

Office of General Counsel

University of Texas System

201 West Seventh Street

Austin, Texas 78701-2902

OR2008-04284

Dear Ms. Longoria:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 306160.

The University of Texas System (the "system") received two requests for information pertaining to a specified investigation. You state that you will release a portion of the requested information. You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.107, 552.108, 552.130, and 552.147 of the Government Code. (1) We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (2)

Section 552.107(1) of the Government Code protects information coming within the attorney-client privilege. When asserting the attorney-client privilege, a governmental body has the burden of providing the necessary facts to demonstrate the elements of the privilege in order to withhold the information at issue. Open Records Decision No. 676 at 6-7 (2002). First, a governmental body must demonstrate that the information constitutes or documents a communication. Id. at 7. Second, the communication must have been made "for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services" to the client governmental body. Tex. R. Evid. 503(b)(1). The privilege does not apply when an attorney or representative is involved in some capacity other than that of providing or facilitating professional legal services to the client governmental body. In re Tex. Farmers Ins. Exch., 990 S.W.2d 337, 340 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1999, orig. proceeding) (attorney-client privilege does not apply if attorney acting in a capacity other than that of attorney). Third, the privilege applies only to communications between or among clients, client representatives, lawyers, and lawyer representatives. Tex. R. Evid. 503(b)(1). Thus, a governmental body must inform this office of the identities and capacities of the individuals to whom each communication at issue has been made. Lastly, the attorney-client privilege applies only to a confidential communication, id. 503(b)(1), meaning it was "not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is made in furtherance of the rendition of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication." Id. 503(a)(5). Whether a communication meets this definition depends on the intent of the parties involved at the time the information was communicated. Osborne v. Johnson, 954 S.W.2d 180, 184 (Tex. App.--Waco 1997, no writ). Moreover, because the client may elect to waive the privilege at any time, a governmental body must explain that the confidentiality of a communication has been maintained. Section 552.107(1) generally excepts an entire communication that is demonstrated to be protected by the attorney-client privilege unless otherwise waived by the governmental body. See Huie v. DeShazo, 922 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. 1996) (privilege extends to entire communication, including facts contained therein).

In this case, a portion of the submitted information consists of communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services. The communications were between system employees and attorneys. You indicate that the communications were to be kept confidential among the intended parties, and you state that the system has maintained the confidentiality of these communications. Thus, you may withhold the information that we have marked under section 552.107(1) of the Government Code.

Next, we address your argument for withholding a small amount of information, which you have marked in the submitted police report, "as non-basic front page information" under section 552.108. Section 552.108 of the Government Code, which provides in relevant part the following:

(a) Information held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime is excepted from [required public disclosure] if:

(1) release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime;

(2) it is information that the deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime only in relation to an investigation that did not result in conviction or deferred adjudication[.]

Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1), (a)(2). Generally, a governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See id. However, in this instance you have only generally raised section 552.108 and have not cited to any specific subsection, nor have you provided any arguments explaining how section 552.108 applies to the information at issue. Thus, the system has failed to demonstrate that the release of the marked information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime or that this information pertains to a case that concluded in a final result other than a conviction or deferred adjudication. See id. §§ 552.108(a)(1), (a)(2), .301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706. Therefore, the system may not withhold the information it has marked in the submitted police report under section 552.108.

We note that section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code may be applicable to a portion of the remaining information. (3) Section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure the current and former home addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers, and family member information of current or former officials or employees of a governmental body who request that this information be kept confidential under section 552.024 of the Government Code. Gov't Code § 552.117(a)(1). Whether a particular piece of information is protected under section 552.117(a)(1) must be determined at the time the request for it is made. See Open Records Decision No. 530 at 5 (1989). The system may only withhold information under section 552.117 on behalf of current or former employees who made a request for confidentiality prior to the date on which the request for this information was made. For those employees who timely elected to keep their personal information confidential, the system must withhold the information we have marked pursuant to section 552.117(a)(1) of the Government Code. The system may not withhold this information under section 552.117(a)(1) for those employees who did not make a timely election to keep the information confidential. However, we note, that the requestors have a special right of access to their own section 552.117 information pursuant to section 552.023 of the Government Code. See Gov't Code § 552.023(b) (governmental body may not deny access to person to whom information relates or person's agent on grounds that information is considered confidential by privacy principles). Accordingly, you may not withhold the requestors' own section 552.117(a) information from them. (4)

Next, you note that the remaining information contains Texas motor vehicle record information. Section 552.130 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure information relating to a Texas motor vehicle driver's license and information relating to a Texas motor vehicle title or registration. Gov't Code § 552.130. We note, however, that section 552.130 excepts information from disclosure in order to protect individuals' privacy. Accordingly, the requestors again have a special right of access under section 552.023 of the Government Code to their own Texas motor vehicle record information, and it may not be withheld from them under section 552.130. See id. § 552.023(a). You must withhold the remaining Texas motor vehicle record information under section 552.130.

In summary, you may withhold the information we have marked under section 552.107 of the Government Code. With the exception of the requestors' own personal information, if the employees at issue made a timely election to keep their information confidential, then you must withhold the employee information that we have marked under section 552.117 of the Government Code. Again, with the exception of the requestors' own information, you must withhold the marked Texas motor vehicle record information marked under section 552.130. The remaining information must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must file suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such a challenge, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can challenge that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Justin D. Gordon

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

JDG/jh

Ref: ID# 306160

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Dr. G. Alberto Arroyo

12618 Morgans Ridge Street

San Antonio, Texas 78230

(w/o enclosures)

Dr. Chia Shun Shih

2211 Newoak Park

San Antonio, Texas 78230

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. Although you raise section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with the attorney-client privilege found in the Texas Rules of Evidence and the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, this office has concluded that section 552.101 does not encompass discovery privileges. See Open Records Decision Nos. 676 at 1-2 (2002), 575 at 2 (1990). Accordingly, we consider your claim regarding the attorney-client privilege under section 552.107. We do not understand you to argue that the submitted information is confidential on any other basis under section 552.101.

2. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.

3. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception, such as section 552.117, on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. See Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987).

4. Regardless of the applicability of section 552.117, section 552.147(b) of the Government Code authorizes a governmental body to redact a living person's social security number from public release without the necessity of requesting a decision from this office under the Act. However, the requestors have a right of access to their own social security number. See generally, Gov't Code § 552.023(b) (governmental body may not deny access to person to whom information relates, or that person's representative, solely on grounds that information is considered confidential by privacy principles).

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs