 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
 |
November 16, 2007 Ms. Margo Kaiser OR2007-15114 Dear Ms. Kaiser: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID #294833. The Texas Workforce Commission (the "commission") received a request for "all of the documents that have been deposited into the files of the [commission]" related to a specified discrimination claim. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (1) Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. Pursuant to section 21.204 of the Labor Code, the commission may investigate a complaint of an unlawful employment practice. See Lab. Code § 21.204; see also id. §§ 21.0015 (powers of Commission on Human Rights under Labor Code chapter 21 transferred to commission's civil rights division), .201. Section 21.304 of the Labor Code provides that "[a]n officer or employee of the commission may not disclose to the public information obtained by the commission under Section 21.204 except as necessary to the conduct of a proceeding under this chapter." Id. § 21.304. You indicate that the requested information pertains to a complaint of unlawful employment practices investigated by the commission under section 21.204 and on behalf of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. We therefore agree that the requested information is confidential under section 21.304 of the Labor Code. However, we note that the requestor is an attorney representing a party to the complaint. Section 21.305 of the Labor Code concerns the release of commission records to a party of a complaint filed under section 21.201 and provides the following: (a) The commission shall adopt rules allowing a party to a complaint filed under Section 21.201 reasonable access to commission records relating to the complaint. (b) Unless the complaint is resolved through a voluntary settlement or conciliation, on the written request of a party the executive director shall allow the party access to the commission records: (1) after the final action of the commission; or (2) if a civil action relating to the complaint is filed in federal court alleging a violation of federal law. Id. § 21.305. The commission has taken final action on the complaint at issue. However, you state that the complaint was resolved through a voluntary settlement agreement. At section 819.92 of title 40 of the Texas Administrative Code, the commission has adopted rules that govern access to its records by a party to a complaint. Section 819.92 provides the following: (a) Pursuant to Texas Labor Code § 21.304 and § 21.305, [the commission] shall, on written request of a party to a perfected complaint filed under Texas Labor Code § 21.201, allow the party access to the [commission's] records, unless the perfected complaint has been resolved through a voluntary settlement or conciliation agreement: (1) following the final action of the [commission]; or (2) if a party to the perfected complaint or the party's attorney certifies in writing that a civil action relating to the perfected complaint is pending in federal court alleging a violation of federal law. 32 Tex. Reg. 553-4 (2007) (to be codified as an amendment to 40 T.A.C. § 819.92). The commission states that "with its recent amendment to regulations, the [commission] has clarified that party access to [Civil Rights Division] ("CRD") records . . . is limited when the complaint is resolved through voluntary settlement. . . .[a]ll CRD records relating to conciliation efforts are considered confidential and cannot be released to even a party unless both parties agree upon a release." In this case, as we have previously noted, you inform us that the complaint at issue was resolved through a voluntary settlement agreement, and that your office has not received consent for the release of the submitted information from both parties. Thus, pursuant to sections 21.305 and 819.92(a), unless it receives consent from both parties, the commission may not release the requested information to the requestor. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining arguments against disclosure This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a). If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, Reg Hargrove Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division RJH/eeg Ref: ID# 294833 Enc. Submitted documents c: Ms. LaNelle L. McNamara 1921 Austin Avenue Waco, Texas 76701 (w/o enclosures) Footnotes1. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |