Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image

 

March 19, 2007

Ms. Cathleen Parsley
General Counsel
State Office of Administrative Hearings
P.O. Box 13025
Austin, Texas 78711-3025

OR2007-03006

Dear Ms. Parsley:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 273699.

The State Office of Administrative Hearings ("SOAH") received a request for "[a]ll materials related to the matter styled Texas Mutual v. Universal Medical Evaluators[.]" You argue that SOAH is not the proper custodian of the requested records. Alternatively, you claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code. We have considered your arguments and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information. (1) We have also considered comments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (interested party may submit comments stating why information should or should not be released).

You inform us that the requested information "is comprised of approximately 817 separate medical dispute resolution cases referred to SOAH from the former Texas Workers' Compensation Commission," which is now the Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers' Compensation (the "division"), and that "these cases were referred to SOAH on or before August 31, 2005." (2) The legislature has transferred to SOAH the hearings functions for the division. Section 2003.021(c) of the Government Code provides that SOAH shall conduct hearings under title 5 of the Labor Code, the Texas Workers' Compensation Act. Section 402.073 of the Labor Code directs the division to adopt by rule a memorandum of understanding with SOAH governing administrative procedure law hearings under the Texas Workers' Compensation Act. The memorandum of understanding has extensive provisions regarding the confidentiality of information obtained by SOAH in connection with the hearings, including the following:

While SOAH will have temporary custody of the hearings records, the Executive Director of [the division] retains statutory authority as custodian of records and is ultimately responsible, as the originating agency, for the release or non-release of the information. Therefore, should any information, which may be confidential under [sections 401.001 et seq., Labor Code], [division] rules, or other law be requested from SOAH by any person or entity, SOAH shall follow all legal requirements to ensure that the confidential information or document is not released, unless specifically required by law, and shall provide such request to the [the division's] executive communication division immediately upon receipt.

28 TAC § 149.6(f). The memorandum of understanding also addresses in detail, inter alia, the treatment of confidential information at hearings. Id.; see also Labor Code §§ 402.083(a), 402.092 (information in or derived from claim file confidential; information in division investigation files confidential).

For purposes of the Act, we conclude that SOAH is acting as an agent for the division in conducting hearings pursuant to section 2003.021(c) of the Government Code and handling division information in connection therewith, but SOAH is not the division's agent for the purpose of responding to written requests for such information. Responsibility for responding to requests for information held by SOAH in connection with such hearings therefore lies with the division. See Open Records Decision Nos. 657 (1997), 617 (1993). Persons making requests for such information should direct their requests to the division.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

James L. Coggeshall

Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Division

JLC/jb

Ref: ID# 273699

Enc. Submitted documents

c: Ms. Mary F. Keller

York, Keller & Field L.L.P.

816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1670

Austin, Texas 78701

(w/o enclosures)


Footnotes

1. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.

2. We note that, effective September 1, 2005, the legislature abolished the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission and established the Division of Workers' Compensation as a division within the Texas Department of Insurance to administer and operate the workers' compensation system. See Lab. Code § 402.001; Acts 2005, 79th Leg., ch. 265, § 1.003, eff. Sept. 1, 2005.

 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs