Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

November 2, 2006

Ms. Karen Hattaway
Assistant Counsel
Office of Legal Services
Texas Education Agency
1701 North Congress Ave.
Austin, Texas 78701-1494

OR2006-12958

Dear Ms. Hattaway:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID#263655.

The Texas Education Agency (the "agency") received three requests, from two different requestors, for average standardized test scores during three different years. You state that the agency is withholding information that is protected by the federal Family Education Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA").(1) You claim that the remaining information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.116 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information.(2) We have also considered comments submitted by one of the requestors. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (interested party may submit comments stating why information should or should not be released).

Section 552.116 of the Government Code provides as follows:

(a) An audit working paper of an audit of the state auditor or the auditor of a state agency, an institution of higher education as defined by Section 61.003, Education Code, a county, a municipality, or a joint board operating under Section 22.074, Transportation Code, is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021. If information in an audit working paper is also maintained in another record, that other record is not excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 by this section.

(b) In this section:

(1) "Audit" means an audit authorized or required by a statute of this state or the United States, the charter or an ordinance of a municipality, an order of the commissioners court of a county, or a resolution or other action of a joint board described by Subsection (a) and includes an investigation.

(2) "Audit working paper" includes all information, documentary or otherwise, prepared or maintained in conducting an audit or preparing an audit report, including:

(A) intra-agency and interagency communications; and

(B) drafts of the audit report or portions of those drafts.

Gov't Code § 552.116. You state that the submitted information constitutes "audit working papers maintained by [the agency]'s Division of Accountability Research in conjunction with audits related to Academic Excellence Indicator System...reports and Gold Performance Acknowledgments[.]" You state that these audits are authorized by sections 39.051 and 39.052 of the Education Code. See Educ. Code § 39.051 (requiring agency to annually review performance of each district and campus based on specific indicators, which include results from SAT and ACT testing, to determine if change in accreditation status is warranted); see also Educ. Code §39.052(a), (b)(1) (requiring agency to prepare and distribute to school districts a report card for each campus, including the academic excellence indicators adopted under 39.051(b)(1) through (10) of the Education Code). Based on your arguments and our review, we agree that the information at issue constitutes audit working papers for section 552.116 purposes. Accordingly, the agency may withhold the information at issue on this basis.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Holly R. Davis
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
HRD/krl
Ref: ID# 263655
Enc. Submitted documents

c: Mr. Michael Keating
Penton Media
1300 East 9th Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Chrys Dougherty
Director of Research
National Center for Educational Accountability
4030-2 West Braker Lane, Suite 200
Austin, Texas 78759
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. In Open Records Decision No. 634, this office concluded that an educational agency or institution may withhold from public disclosure information that is protected by FERPA and excepted from required public disclosure by sections 552.026 and 552.101 of the Government Code without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision as to those exceptions.

2. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB:WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs