 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
|
July 21, 2006 Ms. Yushan Chang
OR2006-07923 Dear Ms. Chang: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 254464. The Houston Police Department (the "department") received a request for information associated with the operation of DRINK Houston. You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.1175, 552.130, and 552.147 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.(1) Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. Section 143.1214 of the Local Government Code provides in relevant part: (b) The department shall maintain an investigatory file that relates to a disciplinary action against a fire fighter or police officer that was overturned on appeal, or any document in the possession of the department that relates to a charge of misconduct against a fire fighter or police officer, regardless of whether the charge is sustained, only in a file created by the department for the department's use. The department may only release information in those investigatory files or documents relating to a charge of misconduct: (1) to another law enforcement agency or fire department; (2) to the office of a district or United States attorney; or (3) in accordance with Subsection (c). (c) The department head or the department head's designee may forward a document that relates to a disciplinary action against a fire fighter or police officer to the [civil service] director or the director's designee for inclusion in the fire fighter's or police officer's personnel file maintained under Sections 143.089(a)-(f) [of the Local Government Code] only if: (1) disciplinary action was actually taken against the fire fighter or police officer; (2) the document shows the disciplinary action taken; and (3) the document includes at least a brief summary of the facts on which the disciplinary action was based. Local Gov't Code § 143.1214(b)-(c). Local Gov't Code § 143.1214(b)-(c). You state that a portion of the information in Exhibit 2 relates to investigations that did not result in disciplinary action. Thus, you indicate that this information is maintained by the department in a departmental file and is not part of the officer's civil service personnel file. See Local Gov't Code § 143.1214(c); see also Local Gov't Code § 143.089(a)-(f). Based on your representations and our review, we conclude that the information at issue in Exhibit 2 is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.1214 of the Local Government Code. See also Open Records Decision No. 642 (1996) (concluding that files relating to investigations of Houston Fire Department personnel by Public Integrity Review Group of Houston Police Department were confidential under section 143.1214). You state that the remaining information in Exhibit 2, however, relates to investigations that did result in disciplinary action. You state that this information is maintained by the department in a departmental file. You also state that the department has forwarded the documents meeting the requirements of section 143.1214(c) to the officer's personnel file maintained under section 143.089(a). However, you state that the remaining information in Exhibit 2 does not meet all of the conditions of section 143.1214(c) for inclusion in the officer's civil service file. Based on your representations, we conclude that the remaining information in Exhibit 2 is excepted from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 143.1214 of the Local Government Code. See also Open Records Decision No. 642.(2) This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a). If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, Jaclyn N. Thompson
c: Kevin Templeton
Footnotes 1. We assume that the representative sample of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office. 2. Because of our ruling, we need not address your remaining arguments. POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB:WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |