Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

September 14, 2005

Ms. Erin Perales
General Counsel
Houston Municipal Employees Pension System
111 Bagby, Suite 2450
Houston, Texas 77002-2555

OR2005-08392

Dear Ms. Perales:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 232827.

The Houston Municipal Employees Pension System (the "system") received a request for six categories of information pertaining to the system's investment portfolio for the second quarter of 2005. You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.104 and 552.110 of the Government Code. You also state, and provide documentation showing, that you notified fourteen companies of the system's receipt of the request for information and of each company's right to submit arguments to this office as to why the requested information should not be released to the requestor.(1) See Gov't Code § 552.305(d); see also Open Records Decision No. 542 (1990) (statutory predecessor to section 552.305 permits governmental body to rely on interested third party to raise and explain applicability of exception in the Act in certain circumstances). DePrince, Legg, Russell, Axiom, Brandes, Loomis, Smith, and Western responded to this notice. We have considered the claimed exceptions and reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, we note that some of the submitted information is subject to section 552.0225 of the Government Code. Subsection 552.0225(b) provides in relevant part the following:

The following categories of information held by a governmental body relating to its investments are public information and not excepted from disclosure under this chapter:

(1) the name of any fund or investment entity the governmental body is or has invested in;

. . .

(8) the remaining value of any fund or investment entity the governmental body is or has invested in[.]

Gov't Code § 552.0225(b)(1), (8). The exceptions to disclosure found in the Act do not apply to information that is made public by section 552.0225. See Open Records Decision Nos. 623 at 3 (1994), 525 at 3 (1989). Therefore, the information subject to subsections 552.0225(b)(1) and (b)(8), which we have marked, must be released.

The system asserts the remaining information is excepted under section 552.104 of the Government Code, which excepts from disclosure "information that, if released, would give advantage to a competitor or bidder." The purpose of section 552.104 is to protect a governmental body's interests in competitive bidding situations, including when a governmental body competes with private entities in the marketplace. See Open Records Decision No. 592 (1991). Under section 552.104, a governmental body may withhold information in order to maintain its competitive advantage in the marketplace if it can demonstrate (1) it has specific marketplace interests and (2) there is a possibility of specific harm to those marketplace interests if the requested information is released. See Open Records Decision No. 593 ("competitive aspect" of previous version of section 552.104 applies to governmental bodies as bidders).

You assert that release of the remaining information "could significantly hinder [the system]'s ability to compete in the equity and fixed income marketplaces by negatively impacting the ability of the investment managers to negotiate favorable trades and to get the best price for its investment." You also state that "[a] person who has information about the securities that managers are purchasing on behalf of [the system] would be able to 'front-run' transactions and bid prices up or down in advance of the [system] transactions."

Based on our review of your arguments and the submitted information, we conclude you have demonstrated that the system has specific interests in the investment marketplace for purposes of section 552.104. See, e.g., Open Records Decision No. 593 (1991). We also find you have demonstrated that the release of the remaining information would cause actual or potential harm to these interests. Therefore, the system may withhold the remaining information under section 552.104.(2)

To conclude, the system must release the marked information under section 552.0225. It may withhold the remaining information under section 552.104.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Office of the Attorney General at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

James L. Coggeshall
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
JLC/seg
Ref: ID# 232827
Enc. Submitted documents

c: Mr. Teal J. Lynch
Thomson Financial
1455 Research Blvd
Rockville, Maryland 20850
(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Cheryl Woodford
Barclays Global Investors
45 Fremont Street
San Francisco, California 94105
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Rex Merchant
Benchmark Plus Management LLC
820 "A" Street, Suite 230
Tacoma, Washington 98402
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Victor A., Zollo, Jr.
DePrince Race & Zollo, Inc.
201 South Orange Avenue, Suite 850
Orlando, Florida 32801
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Andrew J. Bowden
Legg Mason Capital Management
P.O. Box 1476
Baltimore, Maryland 21203-1476
(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Donna Hagerty
Neumeier Investment Counsel
26435 Carmel Rancho Boulevard, Suite 200
Carmel, California 93923
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Jonathan Moll
PIMCO
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300
Newport Beach, California 92660
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Brian Golob
Russell Investment Group
909 A Street
Tacoma, Washington 98402-5120
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Carl E. Metzger
Goodwin Procter LLP
Exchange Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Ian N. Rose
Brandes Investment Partners
P.O. Box 919048
San Diego, California 92191
(w/o enclosures)

Ms. Jean S. Loewenberg
Loomis Sayles & Company
One Financial Center
Boston, Massachusetts 02111
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Jamie House
Smith Graham & Company
600 Travis Street, Suite 6900
Houston, Texas 77002-3007
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Kevin Ehrlich
Western Asset Management Company
385 East Colorado Boulevard
Pasadena, California 91101
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Frank Jordan
GoldenGree Asset Management
300 Park Avenue, 25th Floor
New York, New York 10022
(w/o enclosures)

Mr. Peter Krug
Putnam Investments
One Post Office Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. The system notified the following companies pursuant to section 552.305: Barclays Global Investors ("Barclays"); Benchmark Plus Management LLC ("Benchmark"); DePrince Race & Zollo, Inc. ("DePrince"); Legg Mason Capital Management ("Legg"); Neumeier Investment Counsel ("Neumeier"); PIMCO; Frank Russell Alternative Investment Funds ("Russell"); Axiom International ("Axiom"); Brandes Investment Partners ("Brandes"); Loomis Sayles & Company ("Loomis"); Smith Graham ("Smith"); Western Asset Management ("Western"); GoldenTree Asset Management ("GoldenTree"); and Putnam Investments ("Putnam").

2. Because we are able to resolve this under section 552.104, we do not address the other arguments for exception of the information at issue.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB:WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs