ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
|
February 10, 2005 Mr. David K. Walker
OR2005-01245 Dear Mr. Walker: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 218497. The Montgomery County Sheriff's Department (the "department") received a request for eight categories of information pertaining to a named officer. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.102, 552.108, and 552.140 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information.(1) You assert the information in Exhibit D is excepted under section 552.140 of the Government Code. Section 552.140(a) provides as follows: This section applies only to a military veteran's Department of Defense Form DD-214 or other military discharge record that is first recorded with or that otherwise first comes into the possession of a governmental body on or after September 1, 2003. Gov't Code § 552.140(a). The submitted information does not contain a DD-214 form of a military veteran or other military discharge records. Accordingly, the department may not withhold any of the submitted information under section 552.140. You assert that the submitted college transcript is excepted under section 552.102(b) of the Government Code , which provides as follows: Information is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 if it is a transcript from an institution of higher education maintained in the personnel file of a professional public school employee, except that this section does not exempt from disclosure the degree obtained or the curriculum on a transcript in the personnel file of the employee. Gov't Code § 552.102(b). The named officer is not a professional public school employee; therefore, the district may not withhold the submitted transcript from his personnel file under section 552.102(b). See id. However, the transcript contains the officer's social security number, and section 552.117 of the Government code is applicable to that number. Section 552.117(a)(2) excepts from disclosure the present and former home addresses and telephone numbers, social security number, and family member information of a peace officer regardless of whether the officer requests confidentiality for that information under section 552.024 or 552.1175 of the Government Code.(2) The department must withhold the social security number we have marked in the transcript under section 552.117(a)(2). See Open Records Decision No. 622 (1994). We have marked additional information in the remaining documents that must also be withheld under section 552.117(a)(2). You assert that some of the remaining information is excepted under section 552.101 of the Government Code. Section 552.101 excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision," and it encompasses the doctrine of common law privacy. Common law privacy protects information if (1) the information contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) the information is not of legitimate concern to the public. Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). The type of information considered intimate and embarrassing by the Texas Supreme Court in Industrial Foundation included information relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. Id. at 683. This office has found that the following types of information are excepted from required public disclosure under common law privacy: some kinds of medical information or information indicating disabilities or specific illnesses, see Open Records Decision Nos. 470 (1987) (illness from severe emotional and job-related stress), 455 (1987) (prescription drugs, illnesses, operations, and physical handicaps); personal financial information not relating to the financial transaction between an individual and a governmental body, see Open Records Decision Nos. 600 (1992), 545 (1990); and identities of victims of sexual abuse, see Open Records Decision Nos. 440 (1986), 393 (1983), 339 (1982). We have marked the information that is confidential under common law privacy, and that the department must withhold under section 552.101. You assert that the information in Exhibit E is excepted under section 552.108. Section 552.108(b)(1) which excepts from disclosure "[a]n internal record or notation of a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that is maintained for internal use in matters relating to law enforcement or prosecution . . . if . . . release of the internal record or notation would interfere with law enforcement or prosecution." Section 552.108(b)(1) is intended to protect "information which, if released, would permit private citizens to anticipate weaknesses in a police department, avoid detection, jeopardize officer safety, and generally undermine police efforts to effectuate the laws of this State." City of Fort Worth v. Cornyn, 86 S.W.3d 320, 327 (Tex. App.--Austin 2002, no pet.). After review of your arguments and the information at issue, we find you have failed to show that the release of the information would interfere with law enforcement or crime prevention. See Gov't Code § 552.108(b)(1); Open Records Decision No. 508 at 4 (1988) (governmental body must demonstrate how release of particular information at issue would interfere with law enforcement efforts, unless information does so on its face). Therefore, the department may not withhold any of the submitted information under section 552.108. We note that the submitted information contains Texas motor vehicle record information. Section 552.130 of the Government Code provides in relevant part the following: (a) Information is excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021 if the information relates to: (1) a motor vehicle operator's or driver's license or permit issued by an agency of this state; [or] (2) a motor vehicle title or registration issued by an agency of this state[.] Gov't Code § 552.130. The department must withhold the Texas motor vehicle record information we have marked under section 552.130. We also note that the remaining information contains an insurance policy number. Section 552.136 of the Government Code states that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a credit card, debit card, charge card, or access device number that is collected, assembled, or maintained by or for a governmental body is confidential." Gov't Code § 552.136. The department must, therefore, withhold the insurance policy number we have marked under section 552.136. To conclude, the department must withhold the following: (1) the information we have marked in the transcript and the remaining documents under section 552.117(a)(2); (2) pursuant to section 552.101, the marked information that is confidential under common law privacy; (3) the marked Texas motor vehicle record information under section 552.130; and (4) the marked insurance policy number under section 552.136. The department must release the remaining information. This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a). If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, upon receiving this ruling, the governmental body will either release the public records promptly pursuant to section 552.221(a) of the Government Code or file a lawsuit challenging this ruling pursuant to section 552.324 of the Government Code. If the governmental body fails to do one of these things, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Tex. Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512) 475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, James L. Coggeshall
c: Ms. Vickie Bigham
Footnotes 1. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office. 2. The term "peace officer" is defined by article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB:WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |