Click for home page
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

January 26, 2005

Ms. Veronica Ocañas
Assistant City Attorney
City of Corpus Christi
P.O. Box 9277
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469

OR2005-00769

Dear Ms. Ocañas:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 217715.

The City of Corpus Christi (the "city") received a request for a specified "After Action Report."(1) You state that you have released some responsive information. However, you claim that the remaining requested information is excepted from disclosure pursuant to section 552.111 of the Government Code.(2) We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

Initially, we must address the city's obligations under the Public Information Act ("Act"). Section 552.301(a) of the Government Code requires that a governmental body that receives a written request for information that it wishes to withhold and for which there has not been a previous determination to request a ruling from this office. Pursuant to section 552.301(e) the governmental body must submit the following information to this office within fifteen business days of its receipt of the request: (1) general written comments stating the reasons why the stated exceptions apply that would allow the information to be withheld, (2) a copy of the written request for information, (3) a signed statement or sufficient evidence showing the date the governmental body received the written request, and (4) a copy of the specific information requested or representative samples, labeled to indicate which exceptions apply to which parts of the documents. See Gov't Code § 552.301(a), (e). In this instance, you have not provided a copy of the written request for information and thus have failed to comply with section 552.301.

Pursuant to section 552.302 of the Government Code, a governmental body's failure to comply with the procedural requirements of section 552.301(e) results in the legal presumption that the information is public and must be released. Information that is presumed public must be released unless a governmental body demonstrates a compelling reason to withhold the information to overcome this presumption. See Gov't Code § 552.302; Hancock v. State Bd. of Ins., 797 S.W.2d 379, 381-82 (Tex. App.--Austin 1990, no writ) (governmental body must make compelling demonstration to overcome presumption of openness pursuant to statutory predecessor to section 552.302); Open Records Decision No. 319 (1982). Normally, a compelling reason to withhold information exists where some other source of law makes the information confidential or where third party interests are at stake. See Open Records Decision No. 150 at 2 (1977). Although you assert that the submitted information is excepted pursuant to section 552.111 of the Government Code, this is a discretionary exception that does not provide a compelling reason to overcome the presumption that information is public. See Open Records Decision Nos. 665 at 2 n.5 (2000) (discretionary exceptions in general), 473 (1987) (governmental body may waive section 552.111). Therefore, you may not withhold the submitted information in Exhibit B under section 552.111 of the Government Code. As you raise no other exceptions to disclosure, and the submitted information is not otherwise confidential, we conclude the city must release the submitted information in Exhibit B to the requestor in its entirety.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Debbie K. Lee
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
DKL/seg
Ref: ID# 217715
Enc. Submitted documents

c: Mr. J. Andres Araiza
KRIS Communications
P.O. Box 840
Corpus Christi, Texas 78403
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. As you have not submitted the request for information, we take our description from your brief.

2. Although you initially raised sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code, you have not submitted arguments explaining how these exceptions apply to the submitted information. Therefore, we presume that you have withdrawn these exceptions. See Gov't Code §§ 552.301, .302.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB:WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs