ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
|
September 27, 2004 Ms. Melissa Winblood
OR2004-8173 Dear Ms. Winblood: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under the Public Information Act (the "Act"), chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 209892. The Office of the District Attorney for the Thirty-fourth Judicial District (the "district attorney") received a request for information related to "Cause No. 20030C17301, exclusive of any attorney work product, social security numbers, phone numbers, [or] rap sheets . . . ." You state that the district attorney has released some information to the requestor and you have provided this office with copies of the released information, marked to indicate the information you redacted prior to its release. You claim that this redacted information, as well as the remaining submitted information, is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.103, 552.108, 552.1175, and 552.130 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Initially, we note that some of the submitted records are not responsive to the instant request for information. This ruling does not address the public availability of any information that is not responsive to the request, and the district attorney need not release that information in response to this request. See Econ. Opportunities Dev. Corp. v. Bustamante, 562 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. Civ. App.--San Antonio 1978, writ dism'd). We next note that the previously released information includes complaints. The 78th Legislature amended article 15.26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to add language providing: The arrest warrant, and any affidavit presented to the magistrate in support of the issuance of the warrant, is public information, and beginning immediately when the warrant is executed the magistrate's clerk shall make a copy of the warrant and the affidavit available for public inspection in the clerk's office during normal business hours. A person may request the clerk to provide copies of the warrant and affidavit on payment of the cost of providing the copies. Crim. Proc. Code art. 15.26 (emphasis added). Article 15.04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that "[t]he affidavit made before the magistrate or district or county attorney is called a 'complaint' if it charges the commission of an offense." Id. art. 15.04 (emphasis added). Case law indicates that a complaint can support the issuance of an arrest warrant. See Janecka v. State, 739 S.W.2d 813, 822-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); Villegas v. State, 791 S.W.2d 226, 235 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi1990, pet. ref'd); Borsari v. State, 919 S.W.2d 913, 918 (Tex. App.--Houston [14 Dist.] 1996, pet. ref'd) (discussing well-established principle that complaint in support of arrest warrant need not contain same particularity required of indictment). Thus, a complaint that was submitted to a magistrate in support of the issuance of an arrest warrant is made public by and must be released under article 15.26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. As a general rule, the exceptions to disclosure found in the Act do not apply to information that is made public by other statutes. See Open Records Decision Nos. 623 at 3 (1994), 525 at 3 (1989). In this instance, we are unable to determine whether the complaints at issue were presented to a magistrate in support of the issuance of an arrest warrant. As we are unable to make this determination, we must rule in the alternative. To the extent that the marked complaints were, in fact, "presented to the magistrate in support of the issuance of an arrest warrant," the highlighted information contained in the complaints must be released in accordance with article 15.26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. To the extent that the marked complaints were not so presented, they are not made public by article 15.26 and the highlighted information must be disposed of along with the rest of the submitted information. Next, we address the applicability of section 552.101 of the Government Code to the previously released information. Section 552.101 excepts from disclosure information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision. Section 552.101 also encompasses information that is protected from disclosure by the common-law right to privacy. Information is protected from disclosure under the common-law right to privacy when (1) it is highly intimate or embarrassing, such that its release would be highly objectionable to a person of ordinary sensibilities and (2) there is no legitimate public interest in its disclosure. See Indus. Found. v. Tex. Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976). The type of information considered intimate and embarrassing by the Texas Supreme Court in Industrial Foundation included information relating to sexual assault, pregnancy, mental or physical abuse in the workplace, illegitimate children, psychiatric treatment of mental disorders, attempted suicide, and injuries to sexual organs. Id. at 683. Upon review, we find that a portion of the previously released information is highly intimate or embarrassing and of no legitimate public concern. See Open Records Decision No. 393 (1983) (generally information that either identifies or tends to identify victim of sexual assault or other sex-related offenses may be withheld under common-law privacy). We have marked the information the district attorney must withhold under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. Next, we address your claims for the information not previously released. We note that the documents submitted as Exhibit 10 are subject to chapter 611 of the Health and Safety Code, which provides for the confidentiality of records created or maintained by a mental health professional. Section 611.002 provides in part the following: Communications between a patient and a professional, and records of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient that are created or maintained by a professional, are confidential. Health & Safety Code § 611.002(a). Section 611.001 defines a "professional" as (1) a person authorized to practice medicine, (2) a person licensed or certified by the state to diagnose, evaluate or treat mental or emotional conditions or disorders, or (3) a person the patient reasonably believes is authorized, licensed, or certified. Sections 611.004 and 611.0045 provide for access to mental health records only by certain individuals. See Open Records Decision No. 565 (1990). We have marked the information that constitutes mental health records, which may only be released in accordance with the access provisions of sections 611.004 and 611.0045 of the Health and Safety Code. Next, we address your claims under section 552.108 of the Government Code. Section 552.108(a)(1) excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if . . . release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime[.]" Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1). A governmental body that claims an exception to disclosure under section 552.108 must reasonably explain how and why this exception is applicable to the information that the governmental body seeks to withhold. See id. § 552.301(e)(1)(A); Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977); Open Records Decision No. 434 at 2-3 (1986). You state that the information at issue relates to an active case. Based on your representation, we find that section 552.108(a)(1) is applicable to that information. See Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976) (court delineates law enforcement interests that are present in active cases). Thus, the information that we have marked may generally be withheld under section 552.108. However, section 552.108 does not except from disclosure basic information about an arrested person, an arrest, or a crime. Gov't Code § 552.108(c). We believe such basic information refers to the information held to be public in Houston Chronicle. See id. at 185. We note that basic information includes a detailed description of the offense, but not the driver's license numbers of arrestees. See Open Records Decision No. 127 (1976) (listing basic information that must be released from offense report in accordance with Houston Chronicle). You argue, however, that portions of the basic information that must be released are excepted under section 552.1175 of the Government Code, which provides in part: (b) Information that relates to the home address, home telephone number, or social security number of [a peace officer as defined by article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure], or that reveals whether the individual has family members is confidential and may not be disclosed to the public under this chapter if the individual to whom the information relates: (1) chooses to restrict public access to the information; and (2) notifies the governmental body of the individual's choice on a form provided by the governmental body, accompanied by evidence of the individual's status. Gov't Code § 552.1175(b). You have provided us with a copy of an election form which indicates that the individual whose information is at issue has notified the District Attorney of his election of confidentiality for this information in accordance with the above-cited subsections 552.1175(b)(1) and (2). See, e.g., Open Records Decision No. 678 (2003) (concluding that county voter registrar was authorized to release voter information made confidential under section 552.1175 of Government Code to another governmental entity, but that transferred information would not be confidential in possession of transferee until recipient governmental entity receives a section 552.1175 notification). Thus, the district attorney must withhold that individual's home address pursuant to section 552.1175. The remaining basic information must be released. In summary, the highlighted information in the marked complaints must be released under article 15.26 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the extent that they were submitted to a magistrate in support of the issuance of an arrest warrant. We have marked the information the district attorney must withhold under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. Mental health records may only be released in accordance with the access provisions of sections 611.004 and 611.0045 of the Health and Safety Code. Except for basic information, the district attorney may withhold the information not previously released under section 552.108 of the Government Code. The district attorney must also withhold those portions of the basic information that reveal the home address of a peace officer who has elected to keep such information confidential under section 552.1175 of the Government Code. As our ruling is dispositive, we need not address your remaining claimed exceptions.(1) This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a). If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877)673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512)475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, Cindy Nettles
c: Mr. Gerald Cichon
Footnotes 1. Generally, basic information held to be public in Houston Chronicle, 531 S.W.2d 177, is not excepted from public disclosure under section 552.103 of the Government Code. Open Records Decision No. 597 (1991). |