ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS GREG ABBOTT | |
|
July 29, 2004 Mr. James M. Frazier III
OR2004-6370 Dear Mr. Frazier: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 206128. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (the "department") received a request for a copy of the "duty post" from April 1, 2004 through May 19, 2004. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under section 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exception you claim and reviewed the submitted information. Section 552.108(b)(1) excepts from disclosure an internal record of a law enforcement agency that is maintained for internal use in matters relating to law enforcement or prosecution if "release of the internal record or notation would interfere with law enforcement or prosecution." Generally, a governmental body claiming section 552.108(b)(1) must reasonably explain how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See Gov't Code §§ 552.108(b)(1), .301(e)(1)(A); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). This office has on numerous occasions concluded that section 552.108 excepts from public disclosure information relating to the security or operation of a law enforcement agency. See, e.g., Open Records Decision Nos. 531 (1989) (holding that predecessor to section 552.108 excepts detailed guidelines regarding a police department's use of force policy), 508 (1988) (holding that release of dates of prison transfer could impair security), 413 (1984) (holding that predecessor to section 552.108 excepts sketch showing security measures for execution). You state that the requested shift rosters indicate the name and placement of certain officers within the unit or whether a particular post was manned on certain days. You also contend that this information, if released, could "help inmates in their future attempts to circumvent the security of the prison unit." Having reviewed your arguments and the submitted information, we agree that the release of the rosters would interfere with law enforcement or crime prevention. Accordingly, the department may withhold the requested shift rosters from disclosure under section 552.108(b)(1) of the Government Code. You ask this office to issue a previous determination authorizing the department to withhold shift rosters from public disclosure for security reasons under section 552.108(b)(1). After due consideration, we have decided to grant your request. Therefore, this letter ruling shall serve as a previous determination under section 552.301(a) that the department may withhold the shift rosters for its prison units under section 552.108(b)(1). See Gov't Code § 552.301(a), (f); see also Open Records Decision No. 673 (2001). Moreover, so long as the elements of law, fact and circumstances do not change so as to no longer support the findings set forth above, the department need not ask for a decision from this office again with respect to this type of information requested of the department under Chapter 552 of the Government Code. Id. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512) 475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, Marc A. Barenblat
MAB/jh Ref: ID# 206128 Enc. Submitted documents c: Ms. Jacklan Hampton
|