Click for home page
Office of the ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

May 5, 2003

Ms. Elaine Sample
Assistant City Attorney
City of El Paso
2 Civic Center Plaza
El Paso, Texas 79901-1196

OR2003-2995

Dear Ms. Sample:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 180492.

The Internal Affairs Division of the El Paso Police Department (the "department") received two requests from the same requestor for "Internal Affairs files and/or incident cards" involving two named police officers.(1) You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.108 and 552.117 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted representative sample of information.(2)

We begin by noting that the documents you seek to withhold include an accident report form that appears to have been completed pursuant to chapter 550 of the Transportation Code. See Transp. Code § 550.064 (Texas Peace Officer's Accident Report form). Section 550.065(b) states that, except as provided by subsection (c), accident reports are privileged and confidential. Section 550.065(c)(4) provides for the release of accident reports to a person who provides two of the following three pieces of information: (1) date of the accident; (2) name of any person involved in the accident; and (3) specific location of the accident. See Transp. Code § 550.065(c)(4). Under this provision, the Department of Public Safety or another governmental entity is required to release a copy of an accident report to a person who provides the agency with two or more pieces of information specified by the statute. Id. In this case, the requestor has not provided the department with the required two pieces of information regarding the accident. Thus, the department must withhold the submitted accident report under section 550.065(b) of the Transportation Code.

The submitted documents also include medical records, access to which is governed by the Medical Practice Act ("MPA"), chapter 159 of the Occupations Code. Section 159.002 of the MPA provides:

(b) A record of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that is created or maintained by a physician is confidential and privileged and may not be disclosed except as provided by this chapter.

(c) A person who receives information from a confidential communication or record as described by this chapter, other than a person listed in Section 159.004 who is acting on the patient's behalf, may not disclose the information except to the extent that disclosure is consistent with the authorized purposes for which the information was first obtained.

Information that is subject to the MPA includes both medical records and information obtained from those medical records. See Occ. Code §§ 159.002, .004; Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991). This office has concluded that the protection afforded by section 159.002 extends only to records created by either a physician or someone under the supervision of a physician. See Open Records Decision Nos. 487 (1987), 370 (1983), 343 (1982). We have further found that when a file is created as the result of a hospital stay, all the documents in the file relating to diagnosis and treatment constitute physician-patient communications or "[r]ecords of the identity, diagnosis, evaluation, or treatment of a patient by a physician that are created or maintained by a physician." Open Records Decision No. 546 (1990). Medical records must be released upon the patient's signed, written consent, provided that the consent specifies (1) the information to be covered by the release, (2) reasons or purposes for the release, and (3) the person to whom the information is to be released. Occ. Code §§ 159.004, .005. Section 159.002(c) also requires that any subsequent release of medical records be consistent with the purposes for which the governmental body obtained the records. Open Records Decision No. 565 at 7 (1990). We have marked medical records that may be released only as provided under the MPA. Open Records Decision No. 598 (1991).

Next, you state that the department has two investigatory case files that are responsive to the present requests. You state that the first investigation, submitted as Exhibit B, is an administrative investigation being conducted by the department's Internal Affairs Division. You state that the second investigation, submitted as Exhibit C, is a criminal investigation being conducted by the El Paso County Sheriff's Department. You indicate, and the documents reflect, that both investigations pertain to the same incident involving an off-duty arrest made by one of the named officers. You advise that the criminal investigation is pending, and you state that the administrative and criminal investigations both cover the same factual situations and circumstances. Thus, you contend that both the administrative investigation records in Exhibit B and the criminal investigation records in Exhibit C are excepted from disclosure under section 552.108 of the Government Code. Section 552.108(a) of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "[i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime . . . if: (1) release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime." Generally, a governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain, if the information does not supply the explanation on its face, how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See Gov't Code §§ 552.108(a)(1), (b)(1), .301(e)(1)(a); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977).

We note, however, that section 552.108 generally does not apply to an internal administrative investigation involving law enforcement officers that did not result in a criminal investigation or prosecution. See City of Fort Worth v. Cornyn, 86 S.W.3d 320 (Tex. App.-Austin 2002, no pet.); Open Records Decision No. 562 at 10 (1990); Morales v. Ellen, 840 S.W.2d 519, 525-26 (Tex. Civ. App.-El Paso 1992, writ denied) (statutory predecessor not applicable to internal investigation that did not result in criminal investigation or prosecution); Open Records Decision No. 350 at 3-4 (1982). In this instance, although you contend that the Internal Affairs investigation file relates to a pending criminal investigation, upon review we determine that the Internal Affairs investigation relates solely to an administrative allegation that the officers at issue failed to comply with department policies and procedures, and does not relate to a criminal investigation or prosecution. Therefore, we determine that the department may not withhold any portion of the internal investigation records in Exhibit B pursuant to section 552.108 of the Government Code.

With respect to the criminal investigatory records in Exhibit C, we note that where an incident involving allegedly criminal conduct is still under active investigation or prosecution, section 552.108 may be invoked by any proper custodian of information that relates to the incident. See Open Records Decision Nos. 474 (1987), 372 (1983); see also Open Records Decision No. 586 (1991) (need of another governmental body to withhold requested information may provide compelling reason for nondisclosure under section 552.108). However, you do not indicate that the El Paso County Sheriff's Office, which is the investigating agency, requested that this information be withheld. Therefore, we determine that the department may not withhold the remaining information in Exhibit C under section 552.108.

We next address section 552.101 of the Government Code with respect to a portion of the information in Exhibit C. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision."(3) This exception encompasses information that other statutes make confidential. Exhibit C contains fingerprint information that is subject to sections 559.001, 559.002, and 559.003 of the Government Code. Sections 559.001, 559.002, and 559.003 provide as follows:

Sec. 559.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Biometric identifier" means a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or record of hand or face geometry.

(2) "Governmental body" has the meaning assigned by Section 552.003 [of the Government Code], except that the term includes each entity within or created by the judicial branch of state government.

Sec. 559.002. DISCLOSURE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER. A governmental body that possesses a biometric identifier of an individual:

(1) may not sell, lease, or otherwise disclose the biometric identifier to another person unless:

(A) the individual consents to the disclosure;

(B) the disclosure is required or permitted by a federal statute or by a state statute other than Chapter 552 [of the Government Code]; or

(C) the disclosure is made by or to a law enforcement agency for a law enforcement purpose; and

(2) shall store, transmit, and protect from disclosure the biometric identifier using reasonable care and in a manner that is the same as or more protective than the manner in which the governmental body stores, transmits, and protects its other confidential information.

Sec. 559.003. APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 552. A biometric identifier in the possession of a governmental body is exempt from disclosure under Chapter 552.

Upon review, we find section 559.002 does not permit the disclosure of the submitted fingerprint information in this instance. Therefore, the department must withhold the fingerprints, which we have marked, under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 559.003 of the Government Code.

Section 552.101 also encompasses the doctrine of common law-privacy. Common-law privacy protects information if (1) the information contains highly intimate or embarrassing facts the publication of which would be highly objectionable to a reasonable person, and (2) the information is not of legitimate concern to the public. Industrial Found. v. Texas Indus. Accident Bd., 540 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 (1977). Where an individual's criminal history has been compiled by a governmental entity, the information takes on a character that implicates the individual's right to privacy. See United States Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). Accordingly, the department must withhold any criminal history information compiled by the department under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with common-law privacy.

The submitted documents also contain information that is excepted from disclosure under section 552.117(2) of the Government Code. Section 552.117(2) excepts from required public disclosure the home address, home telephone number, social security number, and the family member information of a peace officer as defined by article 2.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. See Open Records Decision No. 622 (1994). We have marked the information that the department must withhold under section 552.117(2).

Next, we note the submitted documents contain Texas driver's license numbers and license plate numbers that are excepted under section 552.130 of the Government Code. Section 552.130 provides in relevant part:

(a) Information is excepted from the requirement of Section 552.021 if the information relates to:

(1) a motor vehicle operator's or driver's license or permit issued by an agency of this state; [or]

(2) a motor vehicle title or registration issued by an agency of this state[.]

The department must withhold the Texas driver's license numbers and license plate numbers we have marked under section 552.130.

Finally, the submitted documents contain the social security number of a member of the public that may be confidential under with federal law. A social security number may be withheld in some circumstances under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with the 1990 amendments to the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I).(4) See Open Records Decision No. 622 (1994). These amendments make confidential social security number and related records that are obtained or maintained by a state agency or political subdivision of the state pursuant to any provision of law enacted on or after October 1, 1990. See id. We have no basis for concluding that the social security number in the submitted documents is confidential under section 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I), and therefore excepted from public disclosure under section 552.101 of the Public Information Act on the basis of that federal provision. We caution, however, that section 552.352 of the Public Information Act imposes criminal penalties for the release of confidential information. Prior to releasing any social security number information, you should ensure that no such information was obtained or is maintained by the district attorney pursuant to any provision of law enacted on or after October 1, 1990.

In summary, the submitted accident report form must be withheld pursuant to section 550.065(b) of the Transportation Code. The marked medical records may be released only as provided under the MPA. The marked fingerprint information must be withheld under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 559.003 of the Government Code. Criminal history record information must be withheld under section 552.101 in conjunction with common-law privacy. We have marked information that must be withheld under section 552.117(2) of the Government Code. Texas driver's license numbers and license plate numbers must be withheld under section 552.130 of the Government Code. A social security number may be confidential under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with federal law. The remainder of the submitted information must be released to the requestor.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

David R. Saldivar
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
DRS/seg
Ref: ID# 180492
Enc: Submitted documents

c: Mr. Sergio Gonzalez
Attorney at Law
8517 Lockheed
El Paso, Texas 79925
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. You have submitted documentation showing that the department sought and received clarification of the scope of the request from the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.222(b) (governmental body may communicate with requestor for purpose of clarifying or narrowing request for information).

2. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.

3. The Office of the Attorney General will raise a mandatory exception like section 552.101 on behalf of a governmental body, but ordinarily will not raise other exceptions. Open Records Decision Nos. 481 (1987), 480 (1987), 470 (1987).

4. Section 552.101 excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision."
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs