Click for home page
Office of the ATTORNEY GENERAL
GREG ABBOTT
image
 

March 11, 2003

Mr. Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
P.O. Box 13247
Austin, Texas 78711

OR2003-1581

Dear Mr. Aragón:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 177680.

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (the "commission") received a request for (1) complaints against all Houston area dentists and orthodontists who allegedly violated the Medicaid rules and/or procedures, (2) complaints from investigations that were either opened or resolved within the past two years, and (3) any referral letters that were generated as a result of the commission's investigation of the complaints where alleged health violations were referred to the State Board of Dental Examiners. You claim that some of the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101 and 552.108 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the representative sample of information submitted to this office.(1)

Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from public disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Gov't Code § 552.101. This section encompasses information protected by other statutes. Federal and state statutes prohibit the disclosure of information concerning a state plan for medical assistance, except for a purpose directly connected with the administration of the plan. See 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(7); Hum. Res. Code §§ 12.003, 21.012; Open Records Decision Nos. 584 (1991), 166 (1977); see also 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(7); 42 C.F.R. § 431.301; Open Records Decision Nos. 584 (1991), 166 (1977). Section 12.003 of the Human Resources Code provides:

(a) Except for purposes directly connected with the administration of the [Department of Human Service's] assistance programs, it is an offense for a person to solicit, disclose, receive, or make use of, or to authorize, knowingly permit, participate in, or acquiesce in the use of the names of, or any information concerning, persons applying for or receiving assistance if the information is directly or indirectly derived from the records, papers, files, or communications of the [Department of Human Services] or acquired by employees of the [Department of Human Services] in the performance of their official duties.

Hum. Res. Code § 12.003(a). In Open Records Decision No. 584 (1991), this office concluded that "[t]he inclusion of the words 'or any information' juxtaposed with the prohibition on disclosure of the names of the [Department of Human Service's] clients clearly expresses a legislative intent to encompass the broadest range of individual client information, and not merely the clients' names and addresses." Consequently, it is the specific information pertaining to individual clients, and not merely the clients' identities, that is made confidential under section 12.003. See Hum. Res. Code § 21.012 (department shall provide safeguards restricting use or disclosure of information concerning applicants for or recipients of department's assistance programs to purposes directly connected with administration of programs); see also Open Records Decision No. 166 (1977). In this instance, that release of the requested information would not be for purposes directly connected with the administration of the Department of Human Service's assistance programs. Therefore, the information in Exhibit B that you highlighted in green, as well as additional information that we have marked, is confidential under sections 12.003 and 21.012 of the Human Resources Code and must be withheld from disclosure under section 552.101 of the Government Code.

We will now consider your claim for exception pursuant to the informer's privilege for the remaining information in Exhibit B that the commission highlighted in yellow only. The informer's privilege, incorporated into the Public Information Act by section 552.101, has long been recognized by Texas courts. See Aguilar v. State, 444 S.W.2d 935, 937 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Hawthorne v. State, 10 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928). It protects from disclosure the identities of persons who report activities over which the governmental body has criminal or quasi-criminal law-enforcement authority, provided that the subject of the information does not already know the informer's identity. Open Records Decision Nos. 515 at 3 (1988), 208 at 1-2 (1978). The informer's privilege protects the identities of individuals who report violations of statutes to the police or similar law-enforcement agencies, as well as those who report violations of statutes with civil or criminal penalties to "administrative officials having a duty of inspection or of law enforcement within their particular spheres." Open Records Decision No. 279 at 2 (1981) (citing Wigmore, Evidence, § 2374, at 767 (McNaughton rev. ed. 1961)). The report must be of a violation of a criminal or civil statute. See Open Records Decision Nos. 582 at 2 (1990), 515 at 4-5 (1988).

You state that the submitted information contains complaints of persons interviewed by the Medicaid Program Integrity ("MPI") unit of the commission's Office of Investigations and Enforcement ("OIE") regarding possible violations of Medicaid regulations. You also state that the commission is required to cooperate with the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit ("MFCU") of the Office of the Attorney General and other law enforcement agencies in appropriate cases. On this basis, and upon review of the submitted information, we conclude that the commission may withhold, pursuant to section 552.101 and the informer's privilege, the majority of the remaining information in Exhibit B that the commission highlighted in yellow. We have also marked certain information highlighted by the commission in yellow for release.

Lastly, we address your argument under section 552.108 with regard to the information in Exhibit C. Section 552.108 of the Government Code, the "law enforcement exception," provides in relevant part as follows:

(a) [i]nformation held by a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that deals with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime is excepted from the requirements of 552.021 if: (1) release of the information would interfere with the detection, investigation or prosecution of crime[.]

This office has held that an agency that does not qualify as a law enforcement agency may, under limited circumstances, claim that section 552.108 excepts records in its possession from public disclosure. For example, records that otherwise qualify for the section 552.108 exception, such as documentary evidence in a police file on a pending case, do not necessarily lose that status while in the custody of an agency not directly involved with law enforcement. Open Records Decision No. 272 at 1-2 (1981). Similarly, this office concluded that if an investigation by an administrative agency reveals possible criminal conduct that the agency intends to report or has already reported to the appropriate law enforcement agency, then section 552.108 will apply to the information gathered by the administrative agency if its release would interfere with law enforcement. See Gov't Code § 552.108(a)(1), (b)(1); Attorney General Opinion MW-575 (1982); Open Records Decision Nos. 493 (1988), 272 (1981).

In this case, you contend that the complaints and referral letters in Exhibit C are open cases currently under investigation by the MPI. You explain that, if the MPI uncovers sufficient evidence it will refer the cases to the MFCU, a law enforcement agency. Based on your representations and our review of the information at issue, we find that the release of Exhibit C would interfere with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime. Therefore, the commission may withhold Exhibit C from disclosure under section 552.108(a)(1).

In summary, the commission must withhold the information in Exhibit B that it has highlighted in green, along with the information that we have marked, under section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with sections 12.003 and 21.012 of the Human Resources Code. The commission may also withhold the majority of the remaining information in Exhibit B that it has highlighted in yellow under section 552.101 and the informer's privilege. We have also marked information highlighted by the commission in yellow for release. Lastly, the commission may withhold Exhibit C under section 552.108(a)(1). The remaining information must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at (877) 673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Dep't of Pub. Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at (512) 475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Heather Pendleton Ross
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
HPR/sdk
Ref: ID# 177680
Enc: Submitted documents

c: Mr. Tom Abrahams
KTRK ABC 13
3310 Bissonnet
Houston, Texas 77005
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. We assume that the "representative sample" of records submitted to this office is truly representative of the requested records as a whole. See Open Records Decision Nos. 499 (1988), 497 (1988). This open records letter does not reach, and therefore does not authorize the withholding of, any other requested records to the extent that those records contain substantially different types of information than that submitted to this office.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs