|
Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas John Cornyn |
|
June 11, 2002 Ms. Jennifer Lehmann
OR2002-3161 Dear Ms. Lehman: You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 164188. The San Antonio Independent School District (the "district") received a request for copies of statements made by students, parents, or colleagues regarding an alleged incident on March 1, 2002, and copies of the questions used to interview students on March 4, 2002. You state that the questions used to interview students will be released to the requestor. You also state that, with the exception of the student statements, the requested statements have been released to the requestor. You claim that the submitted student statements are excepted from disclosure under sections 552.026, 552.114 and 552.131 of the Government Code, as well as under the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act ("FERPA"). We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information. You claim that the submitted student statements, which were transcribed based on conversations with students, must be withheld under section 552.026 and 552.114 of the Government Code. FERPA provides that no federal funds will be made available under any applicable program to an educational agency or institution that releases personally identifiable information (other than directory information) contained in a student's education records to anyone but certain enumerated federal, state, and local officials and institutions, unless otherwise authorized by the student's parent. See 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(1). "Education records" means those records that contain information directly related to a student and are maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or institution. Id. § 1232g(a)(4)(A). This office generally applies the same analysis under section 552.114 and FERPA. See Open Records Decision No. 634 at 5 (1995). Section 552.114 excepts from disclosure student records at an educational institution funded completely or in part by state revenue. Section 552.026 provides as follows: "This chapter does not require the release of information contained in education records of an educational agency or institution, except in conformity with [FERPA]." In Open Records Decision No. 634 (1995), this office concluded that (1) an educational agency or institution must withhold from public disclosure information that is protected by FERPA and excepted from required public disclosure by sections 552.026 and 552.101 without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision as to those exceptions, and (2) an educational agency or institution that is state-funded must withhold from public disclosure information that is excepted from required public disclosure by section 552.114 as a "student record," insofar as the "student record" is protected by FERPA, without the necessity of requesting an attorney general decision as to that exception. In this instance, however, you have submitted the documents at issue to this office for consideration. Therefore, we will consider whether these documents contain information that is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.026 and 552.114 of the Government Code. Information must be withheld from required public disclosure under FERPA only to the extent "reasonable and necessary to avoid personally identifying a particular student." See Open Records Decision Nos. 332 (1982), 206 (1978). Further, information that does not directly identify a student but would nevertheless make a student's identity easily traceable, must also be withheld. See Open Records Decision No. 224 (1979) (finding student's handwritten comments making identity of student easily traceable through handwriting, style of expression, or particular incidents related in comments protected under FERPA). The information at issue directly relates to particular students. Therefore, the district must withhold the student identifying information pursuant to FERPA. We have marked the types of student identifying information that must be withheld. You claim that the transcribed statements must be withheld in their entirety because the information relayed by the statements would make the identities of the students easy to detect. We conclude, however, that the students' identities have been adequately protected by redacting their names from the submitted information. Therefore, there is no need to withhold any additional information under FERPA. You also claim that the submitted statements are excepted under section 552.131 of the Government Code. Please note that former section 552.131, "Exception: Certain Information Held by School District," was renumbered as section 552.135 by the Seventy-seventh Legislature, effective September 1, 2001. See Act of May 22, 2001, 77th Leg., R.S., H.B. 2812, ch. 1420, § 21.001(54). The revision was non-substantive. Section 552.135 of the Government Code provides that an informer's name or information that would substantially reveal the identity of an informer is excepted from required public disclosure. As we have already held that the students' identities must be withheld under FERPA, we need not address your argument under section 552.135. This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances. This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a). If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e). If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ). Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at 512/475-2497. If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling. Sincerely, Karen A. Eckerle
c: Mr. Bob Comeaux
POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US |