Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

May 7, 2002

Ms. Sheri Bryce Dye
Assistant Criminal District Attorney
Bexar County
300 Dolorosa, 5th Floor
San Antonio, Texas 78205-3030

OR2002-2397

Dear Ms. Dye:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 162509.

The Bexar County District Attorney (the "district attorney") received a request for all information pertaining to a particular murder case. You claim that the requested information is excepted from disclosure under sections 552.101, 552.103, 552.108, and 552.111 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and reviewed the submitted information.

We first note that the submitted case file contains a document that falls within the scope of section 552.022 of the Government Code. Section 552.022 provides that

the following categories of information are public information and not excepted from required disclosure under this chapter unless they are expressly confidential under other law:

. . .

(17) information that is also contained in a public court record[.]

Gov't Code § 552.022(a)(17) (emphasis added). Section 552.022(a)(17) requires the release of the submitted document that has been filed with a court, unless that document contains information that is expressly confidential under other law. Sections 552.103, 552.108, and 552.111 of the Government Code are discretionary exceptions to disclosure that protect the governmental body's interests and may be waived. As such, these exceptions are not other law that makes information confidential for the purposes of section 552.022(a)(17). See Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Dallas Morning News, 4 S.W.3d 469, 475-76 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1999, no pet.) (stating that governmental body may waive section 552.103); Open Records Decision Nos. 542 at 4 (1990) (litigation exception does not implicate third-party rights and may be waived), 177 at 3 (1977) (governmental body may waive statutory predecessor to section 552.108), 470 at 7 (1987) (stating that governmental body may waive statutory predecessor to section 552.111). Consequently, you must release this court-filed document to the requestor (see red flag).

We will next address your argument under section 552.108 for the remainder of the submitted information. Section 552.108 states in pertinent part:

. . . .

(b) An internal record or notation of a law enforcement agency or prosecutor that is maintained for internal use in matters relating to law enforcement or prosecution [is excepted from required public disclosure] if:

. . .

(3) the internal record or notation:

(A) is prepared by an attorney representing the state in anticipation of or in the course of preparing for criminal litigation; or

(B) reflects the mental impressions or legal reasoning of an attorney representing the state.

(c) This section does not except from [required public disclosure] information that is basic information about an arrested person, an arrest, or a crime.

Generally, a governmental body claiming section 552.108 must reasonably explain, if the information does not supply the explanation on its face, how and why the release of the requested information would interfere with law enforcement. See Gov't Code §§ 552.108(a)(1), (b)(1), .301(e)(1)(a); see also Ex parte Pruitt, 551 S.W.2d 706 (Tex. 1977). When a request essentially seeks the entire prosecution file, the information is excepted from disclosure in its entirety pursuant to the holding in Curry v. Walker, 873 S.W.2d 379 (Tex. 1994) (discovery request for district attorney's entire litigation file may be denied because decision of what to include in file necessarily reveals prosecutor's mental impressions or legal reasoning). In this instance, we agree that the request essentially encompasses a request for the prosecutor's entire case file. Curry thus provides that the release of the information would reveal the prosecutor's mental impressions or legal reasoning. Accordingly, except as subsequently noted, you may withhold the submitted information pursuant to subsection 552.108(b)(3) of the Government Code.

We note, however, that section 552.108 does not except from disclosure basic information about an arrested person, an arrest, or a crime. Gov't Code § 552.108(c). We believe such basic information refers to the information held to be public in Houston Chronicle Publishing Company v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. Civ. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1975), writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 536 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. 1976). In Open Records Decision No. 127 (1976), this office summarized the types of information made public pursuant to Houston Chronicle. See Open Records Decision No. 127 at 4 (1976). The district attorney must release to the requestor this information, whether or not the information is found on the front page of an offense report. As we are able to make this determination, we do not address your other raised exceptions.

To summarize, the district attorney must release to the requestor the court-filed document that we have marked pursuant to section 552.022(a)(17). The remainder of the submitted information may be withheld from the requestor under section 552.108(b)(3), with the exception of basic information, which must be released.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the Texas Building and Procurement Commission at 512/475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. We note that a third party may challenge this ruling by filing suit seeking to withhold information from a requestor. Gov't Code § 552.325. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Michael A. Pearle
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division
MAP/seg
Ref: ID# 162509
Enc. Submitted documents

c: Mr. Jim McDougal
110 Brookhaven
Conroe, Texas 77385
(w/o enclosures)


 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs