Click for home page Office of the Attorney General - State of Texas
John Cornyn
image
 

August 31, 2001

Ms. Leticia D. McGowan
School Attorney
Dallas Public Schools
3700 Ross Avenue, Box 74
Dallas, Texas 78204-5491

OR2001-3867

Dear Ms. McGowan:

You ask whether certain information is subject to required public disclosure under chapter 552 of the Government Code. Your request was assigned ID# 151408.

The Dallas Independent School District (the "district") received a request for copies of various documents and findings pertaining to an alleged paddling incident involving a specified district employee. You state that you have released some responsive documents to the requestor. You claim, however, that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure pursuant to sections 552.101 and 552.131 of the Government Code. We have considered the exceptions you claim and have reviewed the submitted information. We have also considered comments submitted by the requestor. See Gov't Code § 552.304 (providing that interested party may make comments stating why information should or should not be released).

You claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code.(1) Section 261.201 provides in pertinent part:

(a) The following information is confidential, is not subject to public release under Chapter 552, Government Code, and may be disclosed only for purposes consistent with this code and applicable federal or state law or under rules adopted by an investigating agency:

(1) a report of alleged or suspected abuse or neglect made under this chapter and the identity of the person making the report; and

(2) except as otherwise provided in this section, the files, reports, records, communications, audiotapes, videotapes, and working papers used or developed in an investigation under this chapter or in providing services as a result of an investigation.

Fam. Code § 261.201. You state that the submitted documents are reports, communications, and working papers used and developed by the Special Investigations Division of the district's Safety and Security Department in an investigation of child abuse allegations. We assume, for purposes of this ruling, that the district's Safety and Security Department constitutes the appropriate local law enforcement agency that maintains authority to conduct such an investigation. See Fam. Code § 261.301(c) (listing agencies authorized to conduct child abuse investigations). Although we agree that most of the submitted documents are reports, communications, and working papers used and developed in an investigation of child abuse allegations, one of the documents which recommends the demotion of the specified district employee and Attachment M, do not appear to constitute such documents. Accordingly, we conclude that, except for the two specified documents, the submitted information is confidential under section 261.201 of the Family Code and, thus, must be withheld from disclosure pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code.

You also claim that the submitted information is excepted from disclosure pursuant to section 552.131 of the Government Code. Section 552.131 provides:

(a) "Informer" means a student or former student or an employee or former employee of a school district who has furnished a report of another person's or persons' possible violation of criminal, civil, or regulatory law to the school district or the proper regulatory enforcement authority.

(b) An informer's name or information that would substantially reveal the identity of an informer is excepted from [required public disclosure].

(c) Subsection (b) does not apply:

(1) if the informer is a student or former student, and the student or former student, or the legal guardian, or spouse of the student or former student consents to disclosure of the student's or former student's name; or

(2) if the informer is an employee or former employee who consents to disclosure of the employee's or former employee's name; or

(3) if the informer planned, initiated, or participated in the possible violation.

(d) Information excepted under Subsection (b) may be made available to a law enforcement agency or prosecutor for official purposes of the agency or prosecutor upon proper request made in compliance with applicable law and procedure.

(e) This section does not infringe on or impair the confidentiality of information considered to be confidential by law, whether it be constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision, including information excepted from the requirements of Section 552.021.

Gov't Code § 552.131. Because the legislature limited the protection of section 552.131 to the identity of a person who reports a possible violation of "law," a school district that seeks to withhold information under section 552.131 must clearly identify the specific civil, criminal, or regulatory law that is alleged to have been violated. See Gov't Code § 552.301(e)(1)(A). After reviewing the information contained within the two remaining documents, we conclude that neither of them contain the type of information which would be excepted from disclosure pursuant to section 552.131. Therefore, neither document is excepted from disclosure pursuant to section 552.131 of the Government Code. Accordingly, you must release the two marked documents contained within the submitted information to the requestor.

In summary, you must release the two marked documents contained in the submitted information. You must withhold the remaining submitted information from disclosure pursuant to section 552.101 of the Government Code in conjunction with section 261.201 of the Family Code.

This letter ruling is limited to the particular records at issue in this request and limited to the facts as presented to us; therefore, this ruling must not be relied upon as a previous determination regarding any other records or any other circumstances.

This ruling triggers important deadlines regarding the rights and responsibilities of the governmental body and of the requestor. For example, governmental bodies are prohibited from asking the attorney general to reconsider this ruling. Gov't Code § 552.301(f). If the governmental body wants to challenge this ruling, the governmental body must appeal by filing suit in Travis County within 30 calendar days. Id. § 552.324(b). In order to get the full benefit of such an appeal, the governmental body must file suit within 10 calendar days. Id. § 552.353(b)(3), (c). If the governmental body does not appeal this ruling and the governmental body does not comply with it, then both the requestor and the attorney general have the right to file suit against the governmental body to enforce this ruling. Id. § 552.321(a).

If this ruling requires the governmental body to release all or part of the requested information, the governmental body is responsible for taking the next step. Based on the statute, the attorney general expects that, within 10 calendar days of this ruling, the governmental body will do one of the following three things: 1) release the public records; 2) notify the requestor of the exact day, time, and place that copies of the records will be provided or that the records can be inspected; or 3) notify the requestor of the governmental body's intent to challenge this letter ruling in court. If the governmental body fails to do one of these three things within 10 calendar days of this ruling, then the requestor should report that failure to the attorney general's Open Government Hotline, toll free, at 877/673-6839. The requestor may also file a complaint with the district or county attorney. Id. § 552.3215(e).

If this ruling requires or permits the governmental body to withhold all or some of the requested information, the requestor can appeal that decision by suing the governmental body. Id. § 552.321(a); Texas Department of Public Safety v. Gilbreath, 842 S.W.2d 408,411 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no writ).

Please remember that under the Act the release of information triggers certain procedures for costs and charges to the requestor. If records are released in compliance with this ruling, be sure that all charges for the information are at or below the legal amounts. Questions or complaints about over-charging must be directed to Hadassah Schloss at the General Services Commission at 512/475-2497.

If the governmental body, the requestor, or any other person has questions or comments about this ruling, they may contact our office. Although there is no statutory deadline for contacting us, the attorney general prefers to receive any comments within 10 calendar days of the date of this ruling.

Sincerely,

Ronald J. Bounds
Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Division

RJB/seg

Ref: ID# 151408

Enc. Marked documents

cc: Ms. Charlotte Calhoun
The Calhoun Law Offices
4622 Maple Avenue, Suite 204
Dallas, Texas 75219
(w/o enclosures)


 

Footnotes

1. Section 552.101 of the Government Code excepts from disclosure "information considered to be confidential by law, either constitutional, statutory, or by judicial decision." Section 552.101 encompasses information protected by other statutes.
 

POST OFFICE BOX 12548, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2548 TEL: (512) 463-2100 WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US
An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer


Home | ORLs